[wip] ci(connect-popup): add test triggered by changes in components

[mroz22]

WIP

to be discussed with qa guys

hmm why it didn't trigge the newly added workflow?

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow that runs a focused set of end-to-end tests for visual component updates related to the connect popup. The workflow is triggered by pull request events on specific paths and includes multiple jobs. One job extracts the branch name from the pull request context, while another job checks out the corresponding code and deploys the component using predefined AWS credentials and other configuration settings. A subsequent job then runs tests based on preset parameters specific to the connect popup functionality. This setup ensures that the targeted tests run separately from the broader build process, maintaining a controlled testing environment specifically for changes related to the connect popup.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/test-connect-popup-mini.yml (1)

10-23: Trigger Conditions and File Pattern Matching

The trigger conditions are well-defined for pull request events on specified paths. However, note that on line 21 the trigger uses the pattern

- ".github/workflows/test-connect-popup-mini"

while the actual file is named test-connect-popup-mini.yml. If the intent is to trigger on changes to this workflow file, consider updating the pattern to include the .yml extension. For example:

-      - ".github/workflows/test-connect-popup-mini"
+      - ".github/workflows/test-connect-popup-mini.yml"

This will ensure that file changes are captured correctly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a6b98b and 9d06040.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/test-connect-popup-mini.yml (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (7)

.github/workflows/test-connect-popup-mini.yml (7)

1-3: Clarity in File Header and Purpose

The header comments clearly describe that this workflow targets a subset of popup tests for visual component changes. This provides good context for reviewers and maintainers, ensuring the file’s purpose is understood at a glance.

---

4-4: Descriptive Workflow Name

The workflow name "[Build/Test] connect-popup e2e - mini" is clear and descriptive, which helps distinguish it from other workflows.

---

6-8: Appropriate Permissions Configuration

The required permissions (id-token: write for OIDC token fetching and contents: read for checkout) are explicitly stated. This careful scoping aligns with the principle of least privilege.

---

25-27: Effective Concurrency Settings

The concurrency configuration dynamically groups workflows based on the workflow name with head reference or run ID, ensuring that in-progress runs are canceled when newer ones start. This is a robust approach for managing workflow executions.

---

29-41: Robust Branch Extraction in 'extract-branch' Job

The extract-branch job efficiently determines the branch name using a simple shell command and sets it as an output for subsequent jobs. This is a practical way to reuse branch information across jobs.

---

42-63: Comprehensive Build and Deploy Process

The build-deploy job properly depends on extract-branch and performs a checkout using the extracted branch. The subsequent step leverages a custom action (./.github/actions/release-connect) to release the connect component to the development environment with specified AWS details.

A few points to consider:

• Ensure that the referenced custom action exists and includes proper error handling.
• Verify that the AWS credentials, region, and server configurations are correct and follow security best practices.

Overall, the implementation looks solid for its intended purpose.

---

64-72: Leveraging a Template Workflow for Test Parameters

The passphrase job reuses a pre-defined workflow template (template-connect-popup-test-params.yml) to run tests with specific parameters. This modular approach is efficient and maintains consistency across similar test jobs.

As this job is intended for QA discussion, ensure that the selected parameters (e.g., testName, serverHostname, and the flags for runWebextension and runCoreInPopup) have been validated with the QA team.