Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix publish workflow #37

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Fix publish workflow #37

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

tjorim
Copy link
Owner

@tjorim tjorim commented Jan 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configurations
    • Simplified Poetry installation process in publish workflow
    • Renamed test workflow job from tests to test

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces minor modifications to GitHub Actions workflow configurations for publishing and testing. The changes primarily involve consolidating Poetry installation in the publish workflow and renaming a job in the test workflow from tests to test. These adjustments streamline the workflow configuration without altering the core functionality of the CI/CD pipeline.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/publish.yml Integrated Poetry installation into the dependency installation step, removing the standalone Poetry installation step
.github/workflows/test.yml Renamed job from tests to test

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Workflow Rhyme 🛠️

In GitHub's garden of code so bright,
Workflows dance with elegant might
Poetry installed, job renamed with care
Simplicity blooms everywhere
A CI/CD bunny's delight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (2)

22-24: Consider using the recommended Poetry installation method.

While the current approach works, consider using Poetry's recommended installation method for better reliability and security. Also, it's advisable to pin the Poetry version to ensure reproducible builds.

Apply this diff to implement the recommended approach:

   run: |
-    pip install poetry
+    curl -sSL https://install.python-poetry.org | python3 - --version 1.7.1
     poetry install

This change:

  • Uses the official installer script
  • Pins Poetry to a specific version
  • Follows the recommended installation method from Poetry's documentation

Line range hint 1-24: Consider adding explicit permissions to the workflow.

For better security, it's recommended to explicitly define the minimum required permissions for the workflow.

Add these permissions after the on section:

on:
  push:
    tags:
      - "v*"

+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  id-token: write  # Required for PyPI trusted publishing

jobs:

This follows the principle of least privilege and prepares for PyPI's trusted publishing feature.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2d4407 and 0b83afc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml

@tjorim tjorim merged commit bc082c6 into main Jan 16, 2025
6 checks passed
@tjorim tjorim deleted the tjorim-patch-1 branch January 16, 2025 23:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant