command: check for too many arguments in pd-ctl unsafe remove-failed-stores

[dveeden]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #9033

What is changed and how does it work?

Check for too many arguments in pd-ctl unsafe remove-failed-stores

Check List

Tests

• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Release note

A check for too many arguments in pd-ctl unsafe remove-failed-stores has been added

[ti-chi-bot]

Hi @dveeden. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tikv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[dveeden]

/retest

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.24%. Comparing base (d9abd06) to head (d63bf63).
Report is 1431 commits behind head on master.

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (74.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9034      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.65%   76.24%   +0.59%     
==========================================
  Files         332      467     +135     
  Lines       33902    71118   +37216     
==========================================
+ Hits        25650    54227   +28577     
- Misses       6056    13509    +7453     
- Partials     2196     3382    +1186     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	76.24% <0.00%> (+0.59%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: okJiang
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign connor1996 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2025-02-08 09:45:38.308020576 +0000 UTC m=+90580.704242637: ☑️ agreed by okJiang.