Infra: Make PEP abstract extration more robust #4356
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This eliminates an AttributeError during PEP editing, if the PEP being edited has an Abstract or Introduction section but with no interior content (i.e. paragraphs) yet. In practice this should have no effect on actual RSS feeds, since merged PEPs should always have a proper abstract. However, this prevents a confusing error from bubbling up during local editing. See python#4355. Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
AA-Turner
reviewed
Apr 11, 2025
AA-Turner
changed the title
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
woodruffw
force-pushed
the
ww/fix-pep-abstract
branch
from
4ee0594 to
5836a73
Compare
AA-Turner
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This eliminates an AttributeError during PEP editing, if the PEP being edited has an Abstract or Introduction section but with no interior content (i.e. paragraphs) yet.
In practice this should have no effect on actual
RSS feeds, since merged PEPs should always have a proper abstract. However, this prevents a confusing error from bubbling up during local editing.
See #4355.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4356.org.readthedocs.build/