feat(backend): generate project #83
Conversation
…include backend requirements
…data requirements and site structure in the requirements document
… schemas and improve schema generation process
…rt and output directory configuration
…nd file modifications
…eps to fullstack generation tests
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/config/common-path.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive modifications to the backend build system, focusing on enhancing project initialization, code generation, and file management processes. The changes span multiple files across the backend infrastructure, introducing new handlers for project setup, backend requirements, file review, and database schema generation. Key improvements include more robust project path handling, expanded context management, and more detailed prompts for code and configuration generation. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (47)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.ts (8)
12-12: Clarify the workspace setup in code
This comment is helpful but somewhat vague. Consider expanding or adding docstrings to clearly state how the workspace is configured for each project.
14-14: Plan for the FIXME
You've left aFIXMEregarding default folder naming. If you plan to support different conventions (e.g., “frontend-backend” vs. “allInOne”), consider placing a reference in your backlog or an open issue.
22-22: Consistency in naming
backendPathandfrontendPathare set in slightly different ways (multiline vs. single line). Minor point, but try to keep your style consistent for clarity.
23-23: Track the TODO
You have a// TODO: setup allInOne.... Consider referencing an issue ID or task tracker note so it’s not overlooked.
24-24: Expose project structure as config
Currently,'frontend-backend'is hardcoded. If you plan to support multiple structures, consider making this configurable or inferred from user inputs.
25-25: Complete the TODO
// TODO: setup project pathsuggests a more advanced path configuration approach is needed. Consider whether you need subfolders or environment-based paths.
26-53: Revisit large commented section
You have a large block of commented-out code describing a more detailed setup. If this code is no longer needed, remove it; otherwise, consider a feature-flag approach to switch betweenfrontend-backendvs.allInOne.
57-57: Return structured status
Returning a simple success string is fine, but you could also return an object containing additional metadata (likeuuid, project paths, etc.) for improved automation later.backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/file-review.ts (7)
12-12: Formalize pre-requirements
You have aTODOindicating the need for a more robust pre-check system for handlers. Consider implementing a dependency injection or a pipeline architecture in your BuildHandlerManager to control execution order.
13-18: JSDoc coverage
Your doc comment outlines the handler’s purpose. Detailing each global context key (likebackendPath,projectName) would clarify usage patterns for new contributors.
19-22: Class vs. logger name
The class isBackendFileReviewHandlerbut the logger uses'BackendFileModificationHandler'. Consider renaming the logger to match the class for consistency and clarity.
23-45: Directory scanning strategy
Currently listing all files in the backend directory might include.git,node_modules, or hidden files. You may want to filter out irrelevant files or directories before proceeding.
46-52: Prompt composition
The prompt for identifying backend files is straightforward. For complex use cases, consider passing structured JSON data or file metadata for better clarity on which files can be modified.
53-60: Empty modifications
If the model responds with an empty or invalid files list, handle that gracefully rather than proceeding with an empty loop or throwing an error.
61-92: Consider concurrency
Modifying each file in a for-of loop is simple but can be slow if there are many files. You might consider parallelizing file writes with Promise.all, carefully handling concurrency or partial failures.backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/prompt.ts (8)
23-24: Enhanced labeling
“### Requirements Documentation” is a great heading, but ensure it fits seamlessly with any upstream or downstream build steps that parse or rely on these headings.
27-28: ClarifydatamapDocusage
You show “2. Frontend Data Requirements” with${datamapDoc}. Consider adding an example or typical structure thatdatamapDocmight contain, helping maintainers parse it.
30-31: Site structure alignment
The “3. Site Structure” referencessitemapDoc. IfsitemapDocis complex (nested routes, dynamic pages), ensure the prompt clarifies how to interpret or incorporate those details.
36-40: Expand real-time example
You mention real-time update requirements. Provide a short example for a real-time endpoint or WebSocket approach to clarify how it integrates with the overall architecture.
42-47: Account for sensitive data
You list data flow, caching strategies, etc. Emphasize how to handle PII and secure caching if the site deals with user data.
65-69: Detail fallback plan
If real-time updates or caching are not used, define how the system degrades gracefully. This ensures partial features don’t cause confusion for simpler deployments.
76-76: Consider PATCH
You list GET/POST/PUT/DELETE. If partial updates are common, PATCH might be needed for more standardized partial modifications.
105-106: Promote known solutions
You mention rate limiting and cache strategy. Consider referencing known solutions like Redis or NGINX for caching, or libraries likeexpress-rate-limit.backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts (3)
13-14: Validate environment compatibility
saveGeneratedCodefrom'src/build-system/utils/files'andpathfrom'path'are introduced. Confirm your environment or bundler includes these modules at runtime without conflicts.
77-77: Log analysis details
After obtaininganalysisResponse, consider logging minimal info (length, snippet) to simplify debugging large or unexpected responses.
159-162: Rollback considerations
UsingsaveGeneratedCodeis neat, but if writing the file fails, you might have a partially generated project. Decide if you need a rollback or to continue partial progress.backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/prompt.ts (5)
32-32: Expand example output
“DBAnalysis” is a good reference heading. You may want to show how to handle advanced entity relationships, triggers, or views for a more realistic scenario.
71-71: Comprehensive doc
Mention how the generated schema ensures idempotency, referencing “CREATE IF NOT EXISTS” logic. This makes it more explicit for future maintainers.
91-99: Idempotent schema best practice
These lines emphasize usage of “CREATE IF NOT EXISTS”. Consider a note about handling schema migrations or versioning if tables already exist but differ in structure.
100-124: Detailed example
The example is quite thorough. If you anticipate advanced constraints, references, or triggers, you could expand this example to illustrate them.
128-145: Flexible validation
Your newvalidateDatabaseSchemafunction is great for ensuring the schema is correct. If you plan to integrate automated CI checks, returning a structured JSON response might simplify verifying partial or non-critical errors.backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/prompt.ts (4)
9-9: Consider supporting TypeScript default.Defaulting
fileTypeto'javascript'is convenient, but some projects may require TypeScript. Consider injecting or auto-detecting project preferences.
12-16: Review default dependencies approach.Embedding
sqlite3andexpressas the only defaults might omit other user requirements. Consider making them optional or letting the user supplement additional defaults.
17-26: Add error logging on dependency file parse failures.You’re already gracefully falling back to default dependencies when JSON parsing fails. Logging the error details could help diagnose invalid dependency files.
28-189: Consider externalizing large prompt text.The extensive prompt is helpful, but consider extracting it into a separate template or documentation resource for maintainability. Ensure the final code generation logic pulls from the correct source.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts (2)
71-95: Implementation code generation is commented out.
Although this might be intentional, it leaves the feature partially implemented. Consider removing or reactivating this logic to avoid confusion.
102-103: Clarify the TODO or remove entirely.
Currently,'implementation': ''is just a placeholder. If the plan is not to generate implementation here, remove the TODO and clarify that purpose.backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts (3)
40-40: TODO mention
Implementing a file-based architecture is a good enhancement. Consider referencing existing patterns.
56-56: Hard-coded language 'javascript'.
Consider retrieving this from global context (as done elsewhere) for better flexibility.
81-81: TODO on returning backend API
Providing structured output for the user or subsequent steps is helpful. Consider implementing soon.backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/prompt.ts (1)
25-61: Capturing logic for identifying required file modifications.
The instructions are thorough. Ensure that the output strictly follows the<GENERATE>block.backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts (2)
110-114: Validate naming consistency.The addition of the "op:BACKEND:REQ" node aligns well with the rest of the pipeline requirements. Consider whether the naming convention remains consistent if you add more backend requirement nodes in the future (e.g., "op:REQ:BACKEND").
135-142: Post-generation review step is a positive addition.The new "Backend Code Review" step promotes best practices by reviewing backend files after generation. Consider storing review results or feedback within logs or an external file for traceability and iterative improvements.
backend/src/build-system/context.ts (1)
77-80: Timestamped UUID is helpful but consider delimiter clarity.Using a timestamp plus UUID ensures better traceability. A small improvement could be using an underscore (“_”) instead of a dash to separate the timestamp from the UUID, making parsing slightly more explicit.
- new Date().toISOString() + '-' + uuidv4() + new Date().toISOString() + '_' + uuidv4()backend/template/template-backend/tsconfig.json (3)
29-30: Consider using a more specific rootDir pathWhile
"./dist"is a good convention foroutDir, using"./"forrootDirmight be too permissive. Consider using"./src"to ensure source files are properly organized in generated projects.- "rootDir": "./" /* Specify the root folder within your source files. */, + "rootDir": "./src" /* Specify the root folder within your source files. */, "outDir": "./dist" /* Specify an output folder for all emitted files. */,
46-46: Consider enabling declaration file generationSince this is a template for backend projects that might be consumed by other services, consider enabling declaration file generation with
declarationanddeclarationMapoptions."sourceMap": true /* Create source map files for emitted JavaScript files. */, + "declaration": true /* Generate .d.ts files from TypeScript and JavaScript files in your project. */, + "declarationMap": true /* Create sourcemaps for d.ts files. */,
64-67: Consider additional exclude patternsWhile excluding
node_modulesanddistis good, consider also excluding test files and coverage directories to optimize the compilation process."exclude": [ "node_modules", - "dist" + "dist", + "**/__tests__", + "**/*.test.ts", + "coverage" ] /* Exclude 'node_modules' and 'dist' directories. */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
backend/template/template-backend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
backend/jest.config.js(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/build-system/context.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/prompt.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/file-review.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/prompt.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/prompt.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/prompt.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/types.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts(5 hunks)backend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/config/config-loader.ts(0 hunks)backend/template/template-backend/package.json(1 hunks)backend/template/template-backend/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)backend/tsconfig.build.json(1 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- backend/src/config/config-loader.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (52)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.ts (5)
4-4: Add error handling for file utilities
You have introduced these file utility imports (buildProjectPath and copyProjectTemplate). If either fails (e.g., missing template path), the operation may throw an error. Consider wrapping these calls in a try-catch block to handle potential file system exceptions more gracefully.
13-13: Ensure projectUUID is set
Check that 'projectUUID' is defined in the global context. If it's missing, the code may break. Consider a fallback or an error if it’s not provided.
15-15: Blank line change
No additional logic introduced.
16-17: Validate template paths
When calling copyProjectTemplate, ensure the relative paths are correct. If the path is incorrect or the template doesn’t exist, the operation will fail. You may want to surface user-friendly errors or warnings.
18-21: Consider verifying generated paths
context.setGlobalContext('frontendPath', buildProjectPath(uuid, 'frontend')) is neat, but if buildProjectPath or the uuid is invalid, subsequent steps might fail. Consider adding a path existence check.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/file-review.ts (2)
1-11: Ensure compatibility with module resolution
You import from 'fs/promises' and 'path' while also depending on nest modules. Confirm your build system resolves these consistently (ESM vs. CommonJS).
107-114: Cautious JSON parsing
parseFileIdentificationResponse uses JSON.parse on model output. The model response might include extraneous text or not be valid JSON. Handle parsing failures or consider validating the shape of parsedResponse.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/prompt.ts (3)
4-5: Optional fallback for new parameters
datamapDoc and sitemapDoc are good additions. If a user doesn't supply them, consider defaulting to an empty string or a note indicating not applicable.
72-72: Endpoint grouping approach
Grouping endpoints by functional area is a solid best practice that scales well for large apps.
78-82: Helpful cross-team documentation
Indicating frontend usage and data transformation clarifies how each endpoint is consumed. Keep this in sync with actual front-end usage to avoid drifting docs.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts (3)
74-75: Check model configuration
Using 'gpt-4o-mini' for analysis is fine if it’s a recognized model. Ensure your environment gracefully falls back if that model doesn’t exist.
107-108: Consistent approach
Reusing the same model for schema generation and analysis fosters consistency. Keep in mind any rate limits that might apply.
156-157: Double-check the uuid
You get the UUID from context. If it’s undefined or empty, path.join will produce incorrect paths. Validate the UUID or provide a fallback.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/prompt.ts (1)
67-67: No functional change
This line appears to be the end of a comment block or minimal text.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/prompt.ts (2)
4-5: Ensure consistent parameter naming and usage.
Renaming and adding parameters is fine. Just verify that any references to DatamapDoc have been updated, and ensure the new backendRequirementDoc parameter is being used where needed.
7-7: Double-check usage of databaseSchemas.
Adding databaseSchemas helps load more context. Confirm it’s utilized wherever the schemas are processed to avoid unused parameters.
backend/jest.config.js (1)
16-16: Confirm intentional ignore of template tests.
testPathIgnorePatterns: ['/template'] will skip all tests in that directory. If this is intended to be scaffolding only, it’s fine. Otherwise, reconsider if you need coverage there.
backend/src/build-system/types.ts (1)
97-98: Validate new operation keys in usage code.
Adding 'op:DATABASE:SCHEMAS' and 'op:BACKEND:FILE:REVIEW' to NodeOutputMap expands the API. Ensure all handlers or references looking up these ops handle the new fields correctly.
backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts (4)
3-4: Good use of path utilities.
This ensures proper cross-platform file path handling by using path and retrieving directories from common-path.
22-22: Verify joined path usage in saveGeneratedCode.
Using path.join(getProjectsDir(), filePath) ensures files go under the projects directory. Check if returning just filePath might cause confusion when the actual file resides elsewhere. Possibly return the full absolute path for clarity.
Line range hint 40-56: Neat optional newFolderName parameter.
Allowing a custom folder name is flexible. Ensure users know how to supply it and confirm that error handling is consistent if they pass invalid or empty strings.
70-76: Centralized project path builder is a solid approach.
buildProjectPath improves consistency. Make sure it’s used wherever a path to the project folder is needed, to avoid duplication of path logic.
backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (2)
13-14: Additional backend handlers.
Imports for BackendRequirementHandler and BackendFileReviewHandler expand capabilities. Ensure they’re referenced correctly in downstream code.
46-47: Handlers successfully registered.
Registering the new backend handlers in the built-in list looks good. This ensures they’re discoverable by the BuildHandlerManager.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts (5)
19-22: Good documentation block.
These lines provide valuable context about the handler’s purpose and responsibilities. No issues here.
38-39: Maintain consistency with global context keys.
Retrieving projectName from the global context is good. Ensure all references to projectName remain consistent across handlers.
42-43: Validate node data retrieval.
Double-check that 'op:UX:DATAMAP:DOC' and 'op:UX:SMD' keys exist before calling getNodeData, or add error-handling if these might be missing.
46-46: Parameter order is correct.
projectName is passed to generateBackendOverviewPrompt in the correct position. Looks good.
48-49: Check parameter alignment with the prompt function.
Passing datamapDoc and sitemapDoc aligns with the updated function signature. Confirm these references are consistent with the new prompt logic.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts (7)
9-10: Imports for saving and path usage.
Adding saveGeneratedCode and path seems appropriate for writing the generated file to disk.
38-38: Retrieve database schemas.
Ensure 'op:DATABASE:SCHEMAS' is populated in prior steps or handle null gracefully.
41-43: Use the backend requirement doc for code generation.
Storing overview in backendRequirementDoc is beneficial. Just ensure the doc is well-structured.
44-44: Renamed output file to 'index.js'.
This is a subtle but significant structural change. Check references that expect 'backend.js'.
52-52: Prompt parameter alignment.
Passing backendRequirementDoc to generateBackendCodePrompt is correct. Looks consistent with the new approach.
54-54: Adding databaseSchemas parameter.
Incorporating DB schema data can aid generation. Validate usage in generateBackendCodePrompt.
76-78: Save code in project-specific directory.
path.join(uuid, 'backend', currentFile) is well-structured. Confirm projectUUID always exists.
backend/src/config/common-path.ts (2)
3-3: Importing cwd from ‘process’.
The direct usage of cwd() is concise and ensures runtime-based path resolution.
8-8: Refactor workspace root resolution.
Using path.resolve(cwd()) can break assumptions if the process is started from an unexpected directory. Confirm downstream code does not rely on a fixed directory structure.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/prompt.ts (4)
1-10: New prompts object creation.
Structuring these prompts within an object is a neat approach. The TODO comment suggests potential format changes. Keep code/doc in sync.
11-24: Detailed docstring for identifyBackendFilesToModify.
Good clarity on parameters and purpose.
63-78: Docstring for generateFileModificationPrompt.
Excellent explanation of inputs and outputs. The method signature is consistent with usage.
79-120: Prompt generation for updating file content.
This looks well-structured. The instructions are methodical, covering various file types. Just confirm that the user’s modifications are validated before final writing.
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts (2)
24-34: New step ensures early project setup.
It’s good to see a dedicated "Project Initialization" step added as the first step in the sequence. This helps in preparing project folders up-front before processing other nodes. No issues found here.
125-130: Dependency addition looks good.
Revising the op:BACKEND:CODE node to include 'op:BACKEND:REQ' as a dependency ensures that all prerequisite steps are satisfied. No issues found.
backend/src/build-system/context.ts (1)
25-27: Extended global context keys are clear.
Adding backendPath and frontendPath to GlobalDataKeys helps track essential project paths. This aligns well with the new initialization logic.
backend/tsconfig.build.json (1)
3-3: Excluding the “template” directory helps streamline the build.
This prevents unnecessary compilation of placeholder files, reducing build time and potential confusion. Validate that no critical resources reside in “template” before finalizing.
backend/template/template-backend/package.json (4)
2-2: Project name changed to “temp-name.”
Ensure this temporary name is replaced before deploying to production if a specific brand/identifier is required.
5-6: Main entry and module type set properly.
Pointing "main" to dist/index.js and adding "type": "module" is consistent with an ES module-based build. This setup looks good.
8-8: Updated start script aligns with compiled output.
Swapping from node dist/server.js to node dist/index.js reflects the new build target. This is coherent with the changed "main" entry.
10-10: Development script no longer uses nodemon.
Running node index.js directly instead of nodemon may reduce developer convenience for hot reload. Confirm if you need real-time reloading; you may want to keep nodemon for local development.
backend/template/template-backend/tsconfig.json (2)
53-54: Verify the impact of enabling strict mode
Enabling strict mode is a good practice for type safety, but since this is a template, we should verify that generated projects can handle the stricter type checking.
✅ Verification successful
Strict mode can be safely enabled in the template
The verification shows that while there are several TODOs and FIXMEs in the codebase, none of them are related to type-checking issues. More importantly, the search for common TypeScript patterns that typically break under strict mode (any, type assertions with as any, and non-null assertions !.) didn't return any matches, indicating that the codebase is already following strict TypeScript practices.
Since:
- No type-related TODOs or workarounds were found
- No usage of
anytype or unsafe type assertions was detected - The template code itself appears to be type-safe
- The strict mode setting is in the template's tsconfig, which will help generated projects maintain type safety from the start
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any TODO or FIXME comments related to type checking
rg -i "todo|fixme|hack|xxx" --type ts
# Look for common patterns that might break under strict mode
ast-grep --pattern 'any'
ast-grep --pattern 'as any'
ast-grep --pattern '!.' # Non-null assertions
Length of output: 3242
Line range hint 1-67: Verify template configuration consistency
Since this is a template file, we should verify that these TypeScript settings align with other template files and the project generation process.
✅ Verification successful
TypeScript configuration is appropriate for backend template
The TypeScript configuration in backend/template/template-backend/tsconfig.json is correctly set up for a backend Node.js application and doesn't need alignment with the React template configurations because:
-
It uses appropriate settings for a Node.js backend:
"module": "commonjs"- standard for Node.js"target": "es2016"- compatible with current LTS Node.js versions"outDir": "./dist"- standard build output directory
-
The React template files (
react-ts/*) use different configurations because they serve different purposes:- They use bundler-specific settings (
moduleResolution: "bundler") - They're split into app and node configs for different parts of the React application
- They include React-specific settings like
jsx: "react-jsx"
- They use bundler-specific settings (
The current backend template configuration follows Node.js backend best practices and doesn't need modification.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all tsconfig files in template directories
fd tsconfig backend/template
# Check for any package.json files that might have conflicting TypeScript settings
fd package.json backend/template -x cat {} | jq -r 'select(.scripts != null) | .scripts | keys[] | select(contains("typescript"))'
Length of output: 342
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of all tsconfig files to compare their settings
echo "=== template-backend/tsconfig.json ==="
cat backend/template/template-backend/tsconfig.json
echo -e "\n=== react-ts/tsconfig.json ==="
cat backend/template/react-ts/tsconfig.json
echo -e "\n=== react-ts/tsconfig.app.json ==="
cat backend/template/react-ts/tsconfig.app.json
echo -e "\n=== react-ts/tsconfig.node.json ==="
cat backend/template/react-ts/tsconfig.node.json
Length of output: 8050
| return { | ||
| success: true, | ||
| data: `Modified files: ${filesToModify.join(', ')}`, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.logger.error('Error during backend file modification:', error); | ||
| return { | ||
| success: false, | ||
| error: new Error('Failed to modify backend files.'), | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Partial modification risk
When an error occurs for one file, the code rethrows immediately, halting modifications. This can leave some files updated and others not. Decide if you need a rollback mechanism or to continue for the rest.
| // Step 3: Validate the generated schema | ||
| const validationPrompt = prompts.validateDatabaseSchema( | ||
| schemaContent, | ||
| databaseType, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| let validationResponse: string; | ||
| try { | ||
| const validationResult = await context.model.chatSync( | ||
| { content: validationPrompt }, | ||
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| ); | ||
| validationResponse = parseGenerateTag(validationResult); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.logger.error('Error during schema validation:', error); | ||
| return { | ||
| success: false, | ||
| error: new Error('Failed to validate the generated database schema.'), | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (validationResponse.includes('Error')) { | ||
| this.logger.error('Schema validation failed:', validationResponse); | ||
| return { | ||
| success: false, | ||
| error: new Error(`Schema validation failed: ${validationResponse}`), | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.logger.debug('Schema validation passed.'); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Structured validation
This validation step is a great addition. If partial issues or warnings exist (not necessarily full “Error”), you might want to parse them separately. Returning just “Error” or “Validation Passed” can be too coarse.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.ts (2)
27-33: Validate inputs and implement project structure configurationThe global context setup needs validation and flexibility improvements:
- UUID should be validated before use
- Project structure should be configurable rather than hardcoded
+ if (!uuid) { + throw new Error('Project UUID is required for initialization'); + } + const projectStructure = context.getGlobalContext('projectStructure') || 'frontend-backend'; context.setGlobalContext( 'frontendPath', buildProjectPath(uuid, 'frontend'), ); context.setGlobalContext('backendPath', buildProjectPath(uuid, 'backend')); - context.setGlobalContext('projectStructure', 'frontend-backend'); + context.setGlobalContext('projectStructure', projectStructure);
64-68: Enhance return value with setup detailsThe current return value provides minimal information. Consider including more details about what was set up.
return { success: true, - data: 'Project setup completed successfully', + data: { + message: 'Project setup completed successfully', + projectUUID: uuid, + structure: context.getGlobalContext('projectStructure'), + paths: { + frontend: context.getGlobalContext('frontendPath'), + backend: context.getGlobalContext('backendPath'), + } + }, };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
backend/.prettierrc(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/context.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/.prettierrc
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- backend/src/build-system/context.ts
- backend/src/config/common-path.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.ts (3)
4-5: LGTM: Clean import additions
The new imports are well-organized and necessary for the enhanced project initialization functionality.
15-15: Address FIXME comment regarding folder conventions
The comment indicates a need to formalize the folder naming convention. Consider creating a configuration or enum for folder names to make it more maintainable.
Would you like me to help create a configuration structure for folder conventions?
34-62: Remove or implement commented code
The commented-out code block contains important logic for different project structures but shouldn't be left as comments. Either:
- Implement the functionality for different project structures
- Create a GitHub issue to track this enhancement
- Remove the commented code if it's no longer needed
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of different project structures?
| copyProjectTemplate( | ||
| path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', '..', 'template', 'react-ts'), | ||
| uuid, | ||
| 'frontend', | ||
| ); | ||
| copyProjectTemplate( | ||
| path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', '..', 'template', 'template-backend'), | ||
| uuid, | ||
| 'backend', | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and template path management
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- No error handling for template copying operations
- Hard-coded template paths could be problematic for maintenance
Consider these improvements:
+ const TEMPLATE_PATHS = {
+ frontend: path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', '..', 'template', 'react-ts'),
+ backend: path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', '..', 'template', 'template-backend')
+ } as const;
try {
copyProjectTemplate(
- path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', '..', 'template', 'react-ts'),
+ TEMPLATE_PATHS.frontend,
uuid,
'frontend',
);
copyProjectTemplate(
- path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', '..', 'template', 'template-backend'),
+ TEMPLATE_PATHS.backend,
uuid,
'backend',
);
} catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error(`Failed to copy project templates: ${error.message}`);
+ throw new Error('Project initialization failed');
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Configuration Updates
Build System Enhancements
Project Structure
Development Workflow