Skip to content

feat: 🎸 CorporateBallots #1459

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: 🎸 CorporateBallots #1459

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

sansan
Copy link
Contributor

@sansan sansan commented Mar 15, 2025

Description

Breaking Changes

JIRA Link

Checklist

  • Updated the Readme.md (if required) ?

@sansan sansan changed the title Feat/da 1469 feat: 🎸 CorporateBallots Mar 15, 2025
@prashantasdeveloper prashantasdeveloper changed the base branch from alpha to develop March 27, 2025 14:07
@prashantasdeveloper
Copy link
Collaborator

Also, you need to rebase the entire PR once on top of develop branch

@sansan sansan force-pushed the feat/DA-1469 branch 3 times, most recently from 944a762 to d770a63 Compare April 10, 2025 12:40
@sansan sansan marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2025 12:45
@sansan sansan requested a review from a team as a code owner April 10, 2025 12:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@prashantasdeveloper prashantasdeveloper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems you forgot to address couple of comments, but other than that LGTM

@sansan sansan force-pushed the feat/DA-1469 branch 3 times, most recently from f5aca3d to 29720e5 Compare April 29, 2025 12:25
@sansan sansan force-pushed the feat/DA-1469 branch 2 times, most recently from 69579a4 to 7e2ca53 Compare May 6, 2025 20:20
@sansan sansan requested a review from prashantasdeveloper May 6, 2025 20:41
/**
* Retrieve all Ballots associated to this Asset
*/
public async get(): Promise<CorporateBallotWithDetails[]> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should accept optional pagination params

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't think we can use it here - we need to get all of the corporate actions to be able to filter out the ballot type and then request details - so can't use pagination on that one

so if we'd add pagination we could then request details only for the paged entries or we'd ned to use sq to replace the first one..

@sansan sansan requested a review from polymath-eric May 9, 2025 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants