Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

quic: discard late retry packets #12645

Closed

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7556

Describe changes:

  • quic: discard late retry packets

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2312

Additional commit after #12626

Ticket: 7556

See RFC 9000 section 17.2.5.2 :
After the client has received and processed an Initial
or Retry packet from the server,
it MUST discard any subsequent Retry packets that it receives.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.77%. Comparing base (d61f36c) to head (da01255).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12645      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.76%   80.77%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         932      932              
  Lines      259381   259389       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits       209484   209532      +48     
+ Misses      49897    49857      -40     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 57.00% <44.44%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
livemode 19.36% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
pcap 44.21% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 63.51% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unittests 58.33% <22.22%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Need some new clippy fixes

@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Feb 21, 2025
@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Waiting for the merge of this one before doing back ports for quic

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #12653, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants