WIP: Feat/data cleanup

[sanjayankur31]

Please feel free to push to this branch also. What needs to be done is explained in the meeting notes here:

https://hackmd.io/@mstimberg/SJz9WJCST

[sanjayankur31]

Questions I came up with (so far 😅):

• "neural mass models" (TVB) -> "Population model?" or should it be a new possibility under "biological_level"?
• tools can have multiple relations, so should the "description" of relations be a list? (See NEURON, and relationship with NeuroML, for example)
• consistency in features: should it be "plotting" or "plots" or another form of the word? "can import" or "imports"?
• model_description_language is also probably not necessary for all tools
• should standards include the biophysical_level feature (we'd decided only simulators should include these---maybe we should say that simulators must include them, and that other tools may optionally have them where appropriate?)
• not all relations need to be bidirectional. For example NestML -> NEST: "language for", but NEST -> "NestML": ?? (doesn't make sense to say "can be described by", the graph will show the one sided relationship anyway?)

[sanjayankur31]

Also created a project board: https://github.com/orgs/OCNS/projects/2/views/1 (but only team members can view it, the organization admins will have to change its visibility)

[sanjayankur31]

The files are valid, it's the bit that reads them that's failing the tests----because we removed some fields and things.

[mstimberg]

LGTM, thanks for the work!
I update the testing script to work with the new data (e.g. most fields are optional, except for tools with the "simulator" feature). I also updated the website to work with the new data, but did not spend the time to actually display the relation descriptions. We'll most likely change the interface in any case. I had a weird issue on my machine and the old version of panel from requirements.txt did no longer work (maybe incompatible with recent Python versions ?), so I updated it to a newer version.