Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisit query feature table sample #181

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

ruiqima
Copy link

@ruiqima ruiqima commented Mar 8, 2024

Description

PR to revisit sample to reflect new changes in Kotlin toolkit.

Links and Data

#3581

What To Review

  • Build and run the sample to check for any errors.
  • Update the MapViewModel to be able to work with the geo-compose module.
  • Add the line to the "Additional information section": This sample uses the GeoCompose Toolkit module to be able to implement a Composable MapView.
  • Replace the application parameter from the MainScreen with the use of LocalContext.current.applicationContext
  • Add the tags: geocompose, tookit
  • Update the sample's metadata.json file to reflect file and tags changes

How to Test

Run the sample on the sample viewer or the repo.

@ruiqima ruiqima changed the base branch from main to feature-branch/geo-compose March 8, 2024 22:26
Copy link

@prupani-7 prupani-7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one comment but looks good to approve!

Copy link
Collaborator

@shubham7109 shubham7109 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

@ruiqima ruiqima merged commit 18f2f67 into feature-branch/geo-compose Mar 19, 2024
1 check passed
@ruiqima ruiqima deleted the ruiqi/revisit-query-feature-table branch March 19, 2024 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants