Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests with Ruby 3.4 #585

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add tests with Ruby 3.4 #585

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions .github/workflows/main.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ jobs:
- "3.1"
- "3.2"
- "3.3"
- "3.4"
- "jruby-9.4"
steps:
- name: Checkout code
Expand Down
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion spec/core/resource_spec.rb
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -455,7 +455,12 @@ def to_param

context "#inspect" do
it "should display nicely" do
expect(ZendeskAPI::User.new(client, :foo => :bar).inspect).to eq("#<ZendeskAPI::User {\"foo\"=>:bar}>")
expected_user_representation = if RUBY_VERSION >= "3.4"
"#<ZendeskAPI::User {\"foo\" => :bar}>"
else
"#<ZendeskAPI::User {\"foo\"=>:bar}>"
end
expect(ZendeskAPI::User.new(client, :foo => :bar).inspect).to eq(expected_user_representation)
Comment on lines +458 to +463
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be done differently:

expect(ZendeskAPI::User.new(client, :foo => :bar).inspect).to eq("#<ZendeskAPI::User #{{'foo' => :bar}}>")

That is, we interpolate a hash directly in the expected output, and it match Hash#inspect behaviour. However, here we only have one such test, and we explicitly are interested in how User#inspect behaves, so I thought it would be better to have two branches.

end
end

Expand Down
Loading