-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
yank release 3.0.3 #2852
Comments
👍 for yanking if it's messing up written data. Just to check, the bug was introduced in 3.0.3, and isn't in 3.0.{2,1,0}? |
I think the bug was associated with #2784? @dcherian @ilan-gold please confirm |
If you want to check the PR specifically: git checkout feeb08f4e49f6574d712fe5ceb42ce80ab6ceb3f And one commit before it: git checkout c66f32b93f1dfe4b4e6deebb22a5ea45d40c5aa5 |
#2854 reverts it and adds extra testing |
Neither do I. @alimanfoo, @jakirkham, @rabernat - can we get the full @zarr-developers/python-core-devs team added as maintainers to this project on PyPI? ![]() |
We should also mark 3.0.3 as broken in conda-forge. Has anyone done this before? I think these are the relevant docs: https://conda-forge.org/docs/maintainer/updating_pkgs/#removing-broken-packages |
(Looking into it this morning. If you're pypi differs from your github, please say the word.) |
thanks josh! |
Thanks @joshmoore I feel bad causing all this hooplah, but also I just want to say I'm so happy with this project. Y'all are awesome! |
you didn't! bad test coverage did! |
much better to have this hooplah now than later! |
we broke a certain indexing incantation with our last release. see #2849. This can lead to data corruption in some cases, so we want to yank release 3.0.3. We will release 3.0.4 today with a fix for the bug. Any objections?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: