Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding to_icechunk as another type of roundtrip tests #393

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jsignell
Copy link
Contributor

I started working on updating the integration tests to use in-memory icechunk stores, but I can't quite get them to pass.

@maxrjones maxrjones added the v3-migration Required for migration to Zarr-Python 3.0 label Jan 29, 2025
@TomNicholas TomNicholas added Icechunk 🧊 Relates to Icechunk library / spec testing labels Jan 29, 2025
@jsignell jsignell changed the title Start using to_icechunk in roundtrip tests Adding to_icechunk as another type of roundtrip tests Jan 30, 2025
@jsignell jsignell mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2025
6 tasks
@jsignell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superceded by #406

@jsignell jsignell closed this Jan 30, 2025
@jsignell jsignell deleted the in-mem-icechunk branch January 30, 2025 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Icechunk 🧊 Relates to Icechunk library / spec testing v3-migration Required for migration to Zarr-Python 3.0
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use in-memory icechunk stores in roundtrip tests
3 participants