Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Support] Request for supporting Sd3.5 Medium #372

Open
pprp opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[Support] Request for supporting Sd3.5 Medium #372

pprp opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@pprp
Copy link

pprp commented Nov 29, 2024

We’ve encountered an issue where our code works correctly with SD3, but fails to function as expected with SD3.5. After running the same code on SD3.5, we’re seeing discrepancies that don’t appear on SD3. Could you please assist us in identifying the bug or compatibility issue?

Specifically, we got the following output from SD3.5

image
@feifeibear
Copy link
Collaborator

Would like to give a merge request for SD3.5. We are willing to help you debug this problem.

@Zctoylm0927
Copy link

Hi, I met the same problem here.

After running the same code on SD3.5

I guess we only change the model path to SD3.5, and the model type remains "SD3" using sd3_example.py. Because the difference between SD3.5 and SD3 is that the former has dual_attention, which changes in norm1 and attn2.
If I set the $GPU to single A800, it could generate the normal picture. But when I run it on 2 A800 and set pp=2, it generates a strange image like above.
Also, I tried it with CFG parallel, which was unable to generate images and exited midway.
Could you please assist us in identifying the bug or compatibility issue?

@feifeibear
Copy link
Collaborator

We will find someone to support SD 3.5 medium in xDiT. Maybe directly apply SD3 code on SD3.5 is not right.

@LWang1016
Copy link

LWang1016 commented Feb 6, 2025

@feifeibear Any update for this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants