You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to reproduce the results of your ablation study, where you only used Social-Context with EWTA-Loss.
However, I habe problems training the model only with social context.
What are the correct flags I need to set for preprocessing (run_preprocess.py) and for training (main.py)?
Looking forward hearing from you soon!
Best regards
SchDevel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi SchDevel, apologies for the delayed response - my CMU inbox is no longer active so I missed your initial email.
Unfortunately, there isn't a "simple" way to run this ablation with only social context using the current codebase. You'd likely have to remove the waypoint prediction step within WIMP_encoder.py and make the corresponding changes in WIMP_decoder.py.
I would've liked for this to be easier to reproduce and I'll try to make this something that's runnable with a single flag in the future, but I haven't been actively worked on this codebase in quite some time. Thanks for understanding!
thank you for your response.
I want to compare an approach I am currently working on with your WIMP approach (because WIMP is very well-thought and has publicly available code).
One part of this is a comparison of the amount of learnable model parameters on your map-free experiment.
I tried to count these parameters in two different ways:
Reimplementation of your model (without the polyline attention) with the implementation details given in the paper: ~23.000.000 learnable parameters
Following your suggestion, I removed the whole centerline processing and the waypoint prediction part of your publicly available code: ~25.000.000 learnable parameters.
Therefore, in my comparison, I would conservatively describe that the results of your map-free evaluation were achieved with >20.000.000 learnable parameters.
Would you agree with this statement?
As already written, I will of course cite your paper accordingly.
Hey there,
I want to reproduce the results of your ablation study, where you only used Social-Context with EWTA-Loss.
However, I habe problems training the model only with social context.
What are the correct flags I need to set for preprocessing (run_preprocess.py) and for training (main.py)?
Looking forward hearing from you soon!
Best regards
SchDevel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: