Tweak refresh performance of E-Ink Spectra 6 (4.0': 10sec, 7.3': 6.7sec) #387
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The E-Ink Spectra 6 is likely not the fastest EPD, however it can be tweaked in case on knows the commands and arguments. With a bit of research, I determined the following: Especially the PLL CONTROL setting makes a huge difference, while the AUTO command can speed up the PON->DRF->POF(->DSLP) with pure hardware.
To give an impression, what the PLL CONTROL setting can do:
The default was 0x08 :-(
With the new setting the 4.0' is below 10 seconds!
The default was 0x03 :-(
With the new setting the 7.3' is achieving 6.7 seconds!!!
The default was 0x02 :-)
I guess, in case of the 13.3', the Waveshare adapter solely supplies a 3.3V with ~330mA (if I am not mistaken). That might be insufficient to refresh faster.
Note: all EPDs are temperature sensitive. This could lead to slower or even better performance in your case, depending on the temperature given.
In case someone is interested in a much cleaner implementation, that can reach a bit faster speeds: https://codeberg.org/psiegl/E-Ink_Spectra_E6/ Hoping someone has the full spec, instead of my reversed engineered one.