Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSS Overflow Navigation Controls #1037

Open
1 task done
flackr opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

CSS Overflow Navigation Controls #1037

flackr opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@flackr
Copy link

flackr commented Jan 9, 2025

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of CSS Overflow Navigation Controls.

Carousels are an often used design pattern on the web. They are used in a variety of contexts, from product listing pages to slideshow like content. OpenUI has explored a range of carousel designs, showing that the specific layout and appearance can vary dramatically. They are also provided by many frameworks as components, however implementing a carousel correctly is complicated and often results in inconsistent and sometimes inaccessible implementations.

There are a variety of problems being solved by carousels, which we believe could be provided by a set of CSS features. Developers could then combine these CSS features to create the various designs. CSS-only component libraries could be built to further simplify this process.

Further details:

  • I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
  • Relevant time constraints or deadlines:
  • The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG
  • The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if different from the current group):
  • Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification:
  • This work is being funded by:
@xiaochengh
Copy link

Hi @flackr! We discussed it at a TAG breakout today and found there are 4 features to be reviewed. Since they target different parts of the carousel pattern, they might need different conversations. So I'm going to split it into 4 sub-issues. Please let me know if that sounds good to you, thanks!

@flackr
Copy link
Author

flackr commented Feb 19, 2025

Thanks @xiaochengh that sounds reasonable to me. I filed them together as a lot of the features are expected to be complementary - e.g. being able to generate a ::scroll-marker off of a ::column makes auto-pagination "just work": https://chrome.dev/carousel/horizontal/pages/ however they are indeed independent features that each have individual value.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants