Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update language for narrow type test. #46

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023

Conversation

aljones15
Copy link
Contributor

Changes the narrow type test to a SHOULD

@aljones15 aljones15 self-assigned this Dec 11, 2023
@aljones15 aljones15 requested a review from BigBlueHat December 11, 2023 21:47
Co-authored-by: BigBlueHat <byoung@digitalbazaar.com>
@aljones15 aljones15 requested a review from BigBlueHat December 12, 2023 15:14
' can process this additional information.', async function() {
'SHOULD specify, or be associated with, additional more narrow types ' +
'(like ExampleDegreeCredential, for example) so software systems ' +
' can more easily detect and process this additional information.', async function() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind fixing the line length? Sorry about that...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah length issues pop up a lot with the github comments will work on it in a moment.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

address here: 3f97008

@aljones15 aljones15 requested a review from BigBlueHat December 12, 2023 18:57
@aljones15 aljones15 merged commit 03d3140 into main Dec 13, 2023
@aljones15 aljones15 deleted the make-skipped-narrow-type-test-should branch December 13, 2023 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants