-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add test for policies with disposition=report in workers #575
Comments
cc @lukewarlow |
We now have much more tests at trusted-types/should-trusted-type-policy-creation-be-blocked-by-csp-*.html ; but still they don't involve workers. |
In case someone else was wondering: |
Right, a list of TT sinks can be found here: #494 (comment) So the ones that can run in workers are:
|
I believe @lukewarlow added complete sink coverage for disposition=enforce. I guess we need at least one case for Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only in worker (maybe eval and another one). |
… complex CSP list., a=testonly Automatic update from web-platform-tests Add TT violation checks for workers with complex CSP list. (#51522) Closes w3c/trusted-types#574 Closes w3c/trusted-types#575 -- wpt-commits: 1bd696a0e8e8225ea33218b9bafbc6ccfd37b8b5 wpt-pr: 51522
… complex CSP list., a=testonly Automatic update from web-platform-tests Add TT violation checks for workers with complex CSP list. (#51522) Closes w3c/trusted-types#574 Closes w3c/trusted-types#575 -- wpt-commits: 1bd696a0e8e8225ea33218b9bafbc6ccfd37b8b5 wpt-pr: 51522
… complex CSP list., a=testonly Automatic update from web-platform-tests Add TT violation checks for workers with complex CSP list. (#51522) Closes w3c/trusted-types#574 Closes w3c/trusted-types#575 -- wpt-commits: 1bd696a0e8e8225ea33218b9bafbc6ccfd37b8b5 wpt-pr: 51522
Looking for "Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only", I can't find any test related to workers:
This is used for the following algorithms:
trusted-types-eval
source expression forscript-src
webappsec-csp#665)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: