-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
/
Copy pathT_LO.tex
166 lines (143 loc) · 6.68 KB
/
T_LO.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
\section{Project: Left-ordered groups}
\begin{definition}
\index{Group!left-ordered}
A group $G$ is \emph{left-ordered} if there is a total order
$<$ in $G$ such that $x<y$ implies $zx<zy$ for all $x,y,z\in G$.
\end{definition}
If $G$ is left-ordered, the \emph{positive cone} of $G$ is defined as $P(G)=\{x\in G:1<x\}$.
\begin{exercise}
Let $G$ be left-ordered with positive cone $P$. Prove that
$P$ is closed under multiplication and that
$G=P\cup P^{-1}\cup \{1\}$ (disjoint union).
\end{exercise}
\begin{exercise}
\label{xca:LO_cone}
Let $G$ be a group and $P$ be a subset closed under multiplication. Assume that
$G=P\cup P^{-1}\cup \{1\}$ (disjoint union). Prove that $x<y$ if and only if
$x^{-1}y\in P$ turns $G$ into a left-ordered group with positive cone $P$.
\end{exercise}
Left-ordered groups behave nicely with respect to extensions. Let $G$ be a group
and $N$ be a left-ordered normal subgroup of $G$. If $\pi\colon G\to G/N$ is the
canonical map and $G/N$ is left-ordered, then
$G$ is left-ordered with
$x<y$ if and only if either $\pi(x)<\pi(y)$ or $\pi(x)=\pi(y)$ and $1<x^{-1}y$.
\begin{proposition}
Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$.
If $N$ and $G/N$ are left-ordered, then so is $G$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Since $N$ and $G/N$ are both left-ordered, there exist positive cones
$P(N)$ and $P(G/N)$. Let $\pi\colon G\to G/N$ be the canonical map and
\[
P(G)=\{x\in G:\pi(x)\in P(G/N)\text{ or }x\in P(N)\}.
\]
A routine calculation shows that $P(G)$ is closed under multiplication
and that $G$ decomposes as $G=P(G)\cup P(G)^{-1}\cup \{1\}$ (disjoint union). It follows
from Exercise \ref{xca:LO_cone} that
$G$ is left-ordered.
\end{proof}
%
%\begin{theorem}
% \label{theorem:}
% Si $G$ tiene una serie finita subnormal $1=G_0\triangleleft
% G_1\triangleleft\cdots\triangleleft G_n=G$ y cada cociente $G_{i+1}/G_i$ es
% abeliano libre de torsión, entonces $G$ es ordenable a derecha. Si además
% $G$ es libre de torsión y nilpotente, entonces $G$ es biordenable.
%\end{theorem}
We now present a criterion for detecting left-ordered groups. We shall need
a lemma.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:fg}
Let $G$ be a finitely generated group. If $H$ is a finite-index subgroup,
then $H$ is finitely generated.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $G$ is generated by $\{g_1,\dots,g_m\}$. Assume that
for each $i$ there exists $k$ such that $g_i^{-1}=g_k$. Let $\{t_1,\dots,t_n\}$ be
a transversal of $H$ in $G$. For $i\in\{1,\dots,n\}$ and
$j\in\{1,\dots,m\}$ write
\[
t_ig_j=h(i,j)t_{k(i,j)}.
\]
We claim that $H$ is generated by the $h(i,j)$. For $x\in H$, write
\begin{align*}
x &=g_{i_1}\cdots g_{i_s}\\
&= (t_1g_{i_1})g_{i_2}\cdots g_{i_s}\\
&= h(1,i_1)t_{k_1}g_{i_2}\cdots g_{i_s}\\
&= h(1,i_1)h(k_1,i_2)t_{k_2}g_{i_3}\cdots g_{i_s}\\
&= h(1,i_1)h(k_1,i_2)\cdots h(k_{s-1},g_{i_s})t_{k_s},
\end{align*}
where $k_1,\dots,k_{s-1}\in\{1,\dots,n\}$. Since $t_{k_s}\in H$, it follows that
$t_{k_s}=t_1\in H$.
\end{proof}
Now the theorem.
\begin{theorem}
Let $G$ be a finitely generated torsion-free group. If $A$ is an abelian normal
subgroup such that $G/A$ is finite and cyclic, then $G$ is left-ordered.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Note that if $A$ is trivial, then so is $G$. Let us assume that $A\ne\{1\}$.
Since $(G:A)$ is finite, $A$ is finitely generated by the previous lemma.
We proceed by induction on the number of generators of $A$. Since
$G/A$ is cyclic, there exists $x\in G$ such that $G=\langle A,x\rangle$. Then
$[x,A]=\langle [x,a]:a\in A\rangle$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ such that
$A/C_A(x)\simeq [x,A]$ (because $a\mapsto [x,a]$ is a group homomorphism $A\to A$
with image $[x,A]$ and kernel $C_A(x)$). If $\pi\colon G\to G/[x,A]$ is the canonical map, then
$G/[x,A]=\langle \pi(A),\pi(x)\rangle$ and thus $G/[x,A]$ is abelian, as
$[\pi(x),\pi(A)]=\pi[x,A]=1$. Moreover, $G/[x,A]$ is finitely generated, as $G$
is finitely generated. Since $(G:A)=n$ and $G$ is torsion-free, it follows that
$1\ne x^n\in A$. Hence $x^n\in C_A(x)$ and therefore $1\leq \rank C_A(x)<\rank A$ (if $\rank
C_A(x)=\rank A$, then $[x,A]$ would be a torsion subgroup of $A$, a contradiction
since $x\not\in A$). So
\[
\rank[x,A]=\rank (A/C_A(x))\leq\rank A-1
\]
and hence $\rank (A/[x,A])\geq 1$. We proved that $A/[x,A]$ is infinite and hence
$G/[x,A]$ is infinite.
Since $G/[x,A]$ is infinite, abelian and finitely generated, there exists a normal subgroup
$H$ of $G$ such that $[x,A]\subseteq H$ and $G/H\simeq\Z$. The subgroup
$B=A\cap H$ is abelian, normal in $H$ and such that $H/B$ is cyclic
(because it is isomorphic to a subgroup of $G/A$). Since $\rank B<\rank A$, the inductive hypothesis implies that $H$ is left-ordered. Hence $G$ is left-ordered.
\end{proof}
\index{Lagrange--Rhemtulla's theorem}
Lagrange and Rhemtulla proved that the integral isomorphism problem
has an affirmative solution for left-ordered groups. More precisely,
if $G$ is left-ordered and $H$ is a group such that $\Z[G]\simeq\Z[H]$, then
$G\simeq H$, see \cite{MR240183}.
\begin{theorem}[Malcev--Neumann]
\index{Malcev--Neumann theorem}
Let $G$ be left-ordered group. Then $K[G]$ has no zero divisors
and no non-trivial units.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
If $\alpha=\sum_{i=1}^na_ig_i\in K[G]$ and
$\beta=\sum_{j=1}^mb_jh_j\in K[G]$, then
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:producto}
\alpha\beta=\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^ma_ib_j(g_ih_j).
\end{equation}
Without loss of generality we may assume that $a_i\ne 0$ for
all $i$ and $b_j\ne 0$ for all $j$. Moreover, we may assume that
$g_1<g_2<\cdots<g_n$. Let $i,j$ be such that
\[
g_ih_j=\min\{g_ih_j:1\leq i\leq n,1\leq j\leq m\}.
\]
Then $i=1$, as $i>1$ implies
$g_1h_j<g_ih_j$, a contradiction. Since $g_1h_j\ne g_1h_k$ whenever
$k\ne j$, there exists a unique minimal element in the left hand side of Equality~\eqref{eq:producto}. The same argument shows that there is a unique
maximal element in~\eqref{eq:producto}. Thus
$\alpha\beta\ne 0$, as $a_1b_j\ne 0$, and therefore $K[G]$ has no zero divisors.
If, moreover, $n>1$ or $m>1$, then~\eqref{eq:producto} contains at least two
terms than cancel out and thus
$\alpha\beta\ne1$. It follows that units of $K[G]$ are trivial.
\end{proof}
\index{Formanek's theorem}
\index{Farkas--Snider theorem}
\index{Brown's theorem}
Formanek proved that the zero divisors conjecture is true
in the case of torsion-free super solvable. Brown and, independently,
Farkas and Snider proved that the conjecture is true
in the case of groups algebras (over fields of characteristic zero) of
polycyclic-by-finite torsion-free groups. These results
can be found in Chapter 13 of
Passman's book \cite{MR798076}.