Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/calibrations cleanup #107

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

Feature/calibrations cleanup #107

merged 30 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

mafrahm
Copy link
Collaborator

@mafrahm mafrahm commented Feb 19, 2025

This PR:

  • adds the Electron Scale and Smearing
  • prepares our config for 2023 data
  • performs some cleanup in calbrator init's
  • adds some more variables for plotting
  • performs some minor changes in the selection
    • fixes the veto tau collection (did not select any taus before)
    • implements fixes for the jetId in nano v12 (TODO: nano v13 fixes with correctionlib json)
    • loosen lepton veto (only veto events with 3 tight leptons)
    • store some selection steps as well as trigger ids even after ReduceEvents
  • 3-lepton category (should be empty after selection)
  • minor auxiliary config info (e.g. groups)
  • add potential Categorizer to WeightProducer to allow last-minute masking of events
  • minor details in inspection tasks + custom yield table task (to be ported back to columnflow at some point) for Data/MC ratio and transposing table

@mafrahm mafrahm requested a review from Lara813 February 19, 2025 13:33
@mafrahm mafrahm self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@Lara813 Lara813 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks very nice, I am interested about the JetId & 2 == 2 logic :)

@Lara813 Lara813 merged commit df0f707 into dev Feb 21, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants