We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
I'm facing a bug, the first element of my schema is being ignored by the parser. By schema example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xs:element name="Administration"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation>Contains administrative data</xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="Errors" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="Error" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="BookStatus" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name="BookStatus"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation>Contains status related data</xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="Reason" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <!-- ... -->
If I switch Administration with BookStatus then BookStatus is missing.
Administration
BookStatus
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
I'm facing a bug, the first element of my schema is being ignored by the parser. By schema example:
If I switch
Administration
withBookStatus
thenBookStatus
is missing.Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: