Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

llms: add enum for ernie 4.0 API path #350

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 10, 2023
Merged

llms: add enum for ernie 4.0 API path #350

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 10, 2023

Conversation

leehaoze
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

This PR adds a new enumeration value to support the ernie 4.0 model in llms.

The only difference in invoking the ernie 4.0 model compared to previous versions is the API path. This path is defined as a series of enumerations, and I've introduced an additional enum value to accommodate the ernie 4.0 model.

  • Read the Contributing documentation.
  • Read the Code of conduct documentation.
  • Name your Pull Request title clearly, concisely, and prefixed with the name of the primarily affected package you changed according to Good commit messages (such as memory: add interfaces for X, Y or util: add whizzbang helpers).
  • Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
  • Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. Fixes #123).
  • Describes the source of new concepts.
  • References existing implementations as appropriate.
  • Contains test coverage for new functions.
  • Passes all golangci-lint checks.

Copy link
Owner

@tmc tmc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tmc tmc merged commit 09a09b3 into tmc:main Nov 10, 2023
tmc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
* Add Ernie 4.0 Model

---------

Co-authored-by: lihaoze01 <lihaoze01@lihaoze01deMacBook-Pro.local>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants