MSL Port Usage #58
-
I've started studying FDTD and doing some tests with openEMS recently and I have some basic questions concerning the usage of the MSL Port (since I couldn't find an explanation on the wiki/tutorials). How should I define the position of the excitation and measurement planes and how far can they be from each other and from the limits (start and stop) of the port? Some simulations I did provided very strange results if I put the excitation plane near the starting "face" of the port (the field would freeze at some time step, using a gaussian pulse excitation). Could I treat the measurement plane position the same way as I treat a calibration/reference plane in real life VNA measurements? And how long should the MSL port be? Could I use just a port to simulate a long MSL line or should I use a small port object connected to the actual MSL line (formed by a PEC material)? Are they both equivalent? I would be very grateful if someone could direct me to some books or materials that would help me to understand those questions better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
These lines are from AddMSLPort.m % create the metal/material for the MSL
MSL_start = start;
MSL_stop = stop;
MSL_stop(idx_height) = MSL_start(idx_height);
CSX = AddBox( CSX, materialname, prio, MSL_start, MSL_stop );
...
port.excite = 0;
if excite
port.excite = 1;
CSX = AddExcitation( CSX, [PortNamePrefix 'port_excite_' num2str(portnr)], 0, evec, excite_args{:} );
CSX = AddBox( CSX, [PortNamePrefix 'port_excite_' num2str(portnr)], prio, ex_start, ex_stop );
end
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
These lines are from AddMSLPort.m
Q: Could I use just a port to simulate a long MSL line or should I use a small port object connected to the actual MSL line (formed by a PEC material)? Are they both equivalent?
A: They are both equivalent since AddMSL…