Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add Flatpak workflow procedures for Satellite #3624

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Add Flatpak workflow procedures for Satellite #3624

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

bangelic
Copy link
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?

Adding Flatpak workflow procedures for Satellite.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

In reference to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-30544.

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

The PR preview for 77a81d7 is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-3624.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

@bangelic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sjha4 Take a look/review and let me know if we captured what we needed from the Google Doc.

@Lennonka Lennonka added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Jan 29, 2025
@bangelic bangelic marked this pull request as draft January 29, 2025 13:24
@bangelic bangelic force-pushed the bangelic-SAT-30544-Document-flatpak-workflow-in-satellite branch from 6ba1777 to fbf2385 Compare January 29, 2025 20:45
@bangelic bangelic force-pushed the bangelic-SAT-30544-Document-flatpak-workflow-in-satellite branch from 41e3ebe to 77a81d7 Compare February 5, 2025 21:26
@sjha4
Copy link
Contributor

sjha4 commented Feb 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

The latest commit looks good to me.. 👍🏼 Couple of notes I dropped in your messages..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sjha4 sjha4 sjha4 left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@bangelic @sjha4 @Lennonka