You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't know whether it ever be necessary for an ordinary pacli user, but during my testing I'm feeling a flag that would really list all the addresses would be needed.
At the moment I'm using the combination of address list -i and address list -p but it requires the double of time the unified command would take and also the output is different, so it's not comfortable to keep the lists in the same file to make the further comparisons.
I don't know whether it really necessary though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm currently working on the address list command due to the change address issue, so flag changes are possible. An idea could be to simply use both flags, -i -p, to see all addresses, as it's not a feature many users would need this might not need a dedicated flag. However I'm currently re-thinking the -i flag, maybe I find a better option.
We haven't used the combination of flags to merge the result of each single flag into one output so far, so for the user it would mean the change of logic he got used to.
For this reason if we decide to implement this feature I'd prefer us to chose a dedicated flag for it, if possible.
I don't know whether it ever be necessary for an ordinary
pacli
user, but during my testing I'm feeling a flag that would really list all the addresses would be needed.At the moment I'm using the combination of
address list -i
andaddress list -p
but it requires the double of time the unified command would take and also the output is different, so it's not comfortable to keep the lists in the same file to make the further comparisons.I don't know whether it really necessary though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: