feat: dont beat around the fees bush

[gomesalexandre]

Description

This PR simplifies the fees by only telling users about the bps as a percentage if applicable, on rate click.
While at it:

• Removes the protocol line items to match mocks

• Makes limit not expandable (there's effectively nothing remaining)

• Uses the same rate/gas component for trade confirm as in input for consistency, and ensures no duplicate "Rate" line item

• Rename "Transaction Fee" to "Network Fees"

• remove fees line items

• discuss with @twblack88 where popover/trigger

• Match rate/gas row with input and remove protocol line item

• Check all other consumoors (limit, LP, RFOX) have happy UI

Issue (if applicable)

closes #8800

Risk

High Risk PRs Require 2 approvals

What protocols, transaction types, wallets or contract interactions might be affected by this PR?

Testing

• Spot input and confirm summary looks good
• Limit input and confirm summary looks good

Engineering

Operations

• 🏁 My feature is behind a flag and doesn't require operations testing (yet)

Screenshots (if applicable)

https://jam.dev/c/471afcb3-cfdb-4fb9-af0e-8156f5382a1c

[gomesalexandre]

Converting to draft as there seems to be some misalignment here re:

• whether we want to use the rate/gas row consistently (seems like consistency is key, as we already use it in input. Proposed by @twblack88 and implemented in this PR, but not part of original designs)
• or, instead of using the rate/gas row in confirm screen, just have items there, unexpanded. Meaning we'd bring a rate line item (which isn't here in this PR, as the rate/gas row is a drop-in replacement for it)

Happy with whichever solution we go with, though if we go with the second, feels odd to have a rate/gas row in trade input and none in the trade confirm screens, something something consistency? Whichever way we go with, should look the same in both screens IMO.