Built site for gh-pages

.nojekyll

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+9a5b8108

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# Open collaboration practices within scientific research: Where we are, where we should be, and how to get there
+
+-   Protocol DOI:
+    [`10.17605/OSF.IO/K9DR5`](https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K9DR5)
+
+The overall aim of the Science Collective is to build a technical and
+social environment that encourages and makes it easy for science to be
+done in an open, rigorous, and collaborative way. Since scientific
+research now almost always requires working with other people. With the
+increasing emphasis on and demand for science to be more open, how we
+collaborate is a key component to making science more easily open from
+the start of any project. But how do we collaborate in an open and
+transparent way? What are the best practices and tools we can use
+reported in the scientific literature? What is an ideal collaborative
+workflow and how close or far are we from this ideal in reality? This
+project aims to address some of these questions.
+
+Our three general outputs for this project are:
+
+1.  A scoping review looking for knowledge on current best practices and
+    how researchers collaborate presently.
+
+    -   Largely this is to map out the space and provide a list of
+        resources for ourselves and others to learn what we already do
+        or know about collaborating.
+    -   The scoping review is more than just the review itself, but also
+        the way we work together and the code we use to do the tasks for
+        the output.
+    -   A side aim is to make this output as automated as possible using
+        R code to extract and present the results into a website format.
+
+2.  An opinionated and theoretical paper on what an ideal open
+    collaboration workflow and setup should look like.
+
+3.  A comparison of where we are right now and where we should be, and
+    how we can start moving towards the ideal.
+
+Another output(s) we are considering to include:
+
+-   A survey sent out determining what researchers and research groups
+    currently do for collaboration.
+
+## Brief description of the folder and file contents
+
+The following folders contain:
+
+-   `data/`: Contains the processed and extracted reference and resource
+    lists for the scoping review.
+-   `data-raw/`: Contains the raw data obtained from the first pass of
+    the scoping review.
+-   `doc/`: Contains the documents for the review, protocol, and the
+    other output documents.
+-   `R/`: R scripts for extracting the references for the scoping review
+    as well as for project management.
+
+## Installing and updating sources
+
+You'll need to install all the packages for this project with (while
+inside the R Project):
+
+``` r
+# install.packages("renv")
+renv::restore()
+```
+
+And to rebuild the sources (which can take some time), run:
+
+``` r
+# To start from scratch, uncomment code below
+# targets::tar_destroy()
+targets::tar_make()
+```
+
+## Contributing to this project
+
+If you are interested in contributing, read our [contributing
+guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md) for more details on how and what you can
+do.
+
+## Code of Conduct
+
+Please note that the scoping-review project is released with a
+[Contributor Code of
+Conduct](https://contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.html).
+By contributing to this project, you agree to abide by its terms.