Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jira Downloader without using JirAgileR #278

Closed
wants to merge 21 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Ssunoo2
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ssunoo2 Ssunoo2 commented Feb 17, 2024

#275

Edit by Carlos: This PR was closed and continued on: #279

downloadJiraDatawithoutJiragileR+firstattemptatpagination
…unction to different paths

I added pagination and amalgamated the parameter variables into the function calls themselves
Pagination working and issues and comments being downloaded via the f…
…d via the function to different paths

sailuh#275 Added pagination and amalgamated the parameter variables into the function calls themselves
each file should download as a separate json document with its issue id and time downloaded appended to its name. The path for the file is the same but the filename has been changed in the geronimo config file as the function constructs the filename in its loop.
Downloads each issue into a new file with a filename constructed from issue ID and date downloaded. Refresh capability not yet functional
sailuh#275 Jira Downloader now downloads each issue into separate files
The new Jira Downloader function is in the file: fetch_and_save_jira_issues.rmd. Also updated the News.md
@Ssunoo2 Ssunoo2 changed the title Jira Downloader without using JirAgileR #275 Jira Downloader without using JirAgileR Feb 17, 2024
@Ssunoo2 Ssunoo2 marked this pull request as draft February 17, 2024 23:02
I changed the config files when working and testing have reverted them back for pull request
I modified tools.yml for personal use and have reverted it to the original values
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9294a9b) 27.37% compared to head (62cad91) 27.37%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #278   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.37%   27.37%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        2871     2871           
=======================================
  Hits          786      786           
  Misses       2085     2085           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

I altered the tools and config files and they should be the original values now
@Ssunoo2 Ssunoo2 closed this Feb 17, 2024
@carlosparadis carlosparadis added the status:duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Feb 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status:duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants