Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

f.sin().asin() sometimes returns NaN #4207

Closed
RalfJung opened this issue Feb 25, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

f.sin().asin() sometimes returns NaN #4207

RalfJung opened this issue Feb 25, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Feb 25, 2025

This code prints some NaN with latest Miri (not yet synced into rustc):

fn main() {
    let f = std::f64::consts::FRAC_PI_2;
    for _ in 0..64 {
        println!("{}", (dbg!(f.sin()).asin() - std::f64::consts::FRAC_PI_2).abs());
    }
}

The reason is that f.sin() can return values slightly above 1 due to the imprecision we add, and then asin() returns NaN. That seems undesirable.

@tgross35 is there some sort of guarantee that f.sin(), while it can be imprecise, will always return values that strictly satisfy x <= 1.0? Or should asin be more accepting of values slightly above NaN?

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think anything is actually guaranteed here, assuming the implementations follow the C spec. But if this is causing problems it's probably fine for Miri to ensure the nondeterminism is still bounded by the output domain, I think this is a much less likely failure mode compared to general imprecision.

Cc #4208

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #4208.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants