Suggest boxing if then expr if that solves divergent arms

When encountering

```rust
let _ = if true {
    Struct
} else {
    foo() // -> Box<dyn Trait>
};
```

if `Struct` implements `Trait`, suggest boxing the then arm tail expression.

Part of rust-lang#102629.

compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/note_and_explain.rs

@@ -330,6 +330,38 @@ impl<T> Trait<T> for X {
                             );
                         }
                     }
+                    (ty::Adt(_, _), ty::Adt(def, args))
+                        if let ObligationCauseCode::IfExpression(cause) = cause.code()
+                            && let hir::Node::Block(blk) = self.tcx.hir_node(cause.then_id)
+                            && let Some(then) = blk.expr
+                            && def.is_box()
+                            && let boxed_ty = args.type_at(0)
+                            && let ty::Dynamic(t, _, _) = boxed_ty.kind()
+                            && let Some(def_id) = t.principal_def_id()
+                            && let mut impl_def_ids = vec![]
+                            && let _ =
+                                tcx.for_each_relevant_impl(def_id, values.expected, |did| {
+                                    impl_def_ids.push(did)
+                                })
+                            && let [_] = &impl_def_ids[..] =>
+                    {
+                        // We have divergent if/else arms where the expected value is a type that
+                        // implements the trait of the found boxed trait object.
+                        diag.multipart_suggestion(
+                            format!(
+                                "`{}` implements `{}` so you can box it to coerce to the trait \
+                                 object `{}`",
+                                values.expected,
+                                tcx.item_name(def_id),
+                                values.found,
+                            ),
+                            vec![
+                                (then.span.shrink_to_lo(), "Box::new(".to_string()),
+                                (then.span.shrink_to_hi(), ")".to_string()),
+                            ],
+                            MachineApplicable,
+                        );
+                    }
                     _ => {}
                 }
                 debug!(

tests/ui/typeck/suggest-box-on-divergent-if-else-arms.fixed

@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ fn foo() -> Box<dyn Trait> {
     Box::new(Struct)
 }
 fn main() {
+    let _ = if true {
+        Box::new(Struct)
+    } else {
+        foo() //~ ERROR E0308
+    };
     let _ = if true {
         foo()
     } else {

tests/ui/typeck/suggest-box-on-divergent-if-else-arms.rs

@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ fn foo() -> Box<dyn Trait> {
     Box::new(Struct)
 }
 fn main() {
+    let _ = if true {
+        Struct
+    } else {
+        foo() //~ ERROR E0308
+    };
     let _ = if true {
         foo()
     } else {

tests/ui/typeck/suggest-box-on-divergent-if-else-arms.stderr

@@ -3,6 +3,26 @@ error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
    |
 LL |       let _ = if true {
    |  _____________-
+LL | |         Struct
+   | |         ------ expected because of this
+LL | |     } else {
+LL | |         foo()
+   | |         ^^^^^ expected `Struct`, found `Box<dyn Trait>`
+LL | |     };
+   | |_____- `if` and `else` have incompatible types
+   |
+   = note: expected struct `Struct`
+              found struct `Box<dyn Trait>`
+help: `Struct` implements `Trait` so you can box it to coerce to the trait object `Box<dyn Trait>`
+   |
+LL |         Box::new(Struct)
+   |         +++++++++      +
+
+error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
+  --> $DIR/suggest-box-on-divergent-if-else-arms.rs:17:9
+   |
+LL |       let _ = if true {
+   |  _____________-
 LL | |         foo()
    | |         ----- expected because of this
 LL | |     } else {
@@ -19,6 +39,6 @@ help: store this in the heap by calling `Box::new`
 LL |         Box::new(Struct)
    |         +++++++++      +
 
-error: aborting due to 1 previous error
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
 
 For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.