[general] Broken reverse depenency with newest R2jags

[giabaio]

Help

• I understand and agree to https://books.ropensci.org/targets/help.html.

Description

@suyusung and I have been working on making some key changes to the current version of R2jags (see CHANGELOG here and the issue here.

I think that the new summary table (which displays the DIC penalty using the more appropriate name of pV and the revised jags function, which allows the user to actually also compute the "proper" pD, using the relevant definition) kind of breaks the tests you automatically run on jagstargets.

Would you consider checking and possibly adjusting your package? I think it's mainly in terms of the output you retrieve (and code up in the tests) --- no structural change has happened in R2jags (well... that's not really true, as I think we fixed a major bug in making R2jags properly use the warmup phase...), but the output is presented differently.

[wlandau]

Should be fixed in 392fa9a