Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fixed alldebrid instantavail file processing #916

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dreulavelle
Copy link
Member

@dreulavelle dreulavelle commented Nov 27, 2024

Pull Request Check List

Resolves: #issue-number-here

  • Added tests for changed code.
  • Updated documentation for changed code.

Description:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified error message for missing valid files, enhancing clarity for users.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced processing of file and directory entries in the availability check, improving the flexibility and maintainability of the feature.

These changes aim to provide a more user-friendly experience while maintaining existing functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the error handling in the Downloader class and a significant restructuring of the get_instant_availability method in the AllDebridDownloader class. The error message for missing valid files has been simplified, while the processing logic for file entries has been enhanced through the introduction of a nested function that improves clarity and maintainability. The overall functionality and control flow of both classes remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/program/services/downloaders/init.py Modified the error message in the run method of the Downloader class to a more generic statement when no valid files are found.
src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py Updated the get_instant_availability method in the AllDebridDownloader class to use a nested function for processing file entries, enhancing clarity and maintainability.

Poem

🐇 In the burrow where code does play,
A message simplified, brightens the day.
With functions nested, the files do dance,
Clarity blooms, giving logic a chance.
Hooray for the changes, let’s hop and cheer,
For a cleaner codebase, we hold so dear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py (1)

135-155: Tests needed for the new file processing logic.

The changes introduce complex file processing logic that should be thoroughly tested. Consider adding tests for:

  • Processing of single files
  • Processing of nested directories
  • Handling of malformed entries
  • Maximum directory depth scenarios
  • Edge cases with empty or invalid entries

Would you like me to help create a test suite for these scenarios? I can generate comprehensive test cases that cover all the edge cases and main functionality.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73b5179 and b0d704d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/program/services/downloaders/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
src/program/services/downloaders/__init__.py

66-66: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/program/services/downloaders/__init__.py (1)

Line range hint 1-191: Verify completeness of changes

The PR title and objectives mention fixing "alldebrid instantavail file processing", but only a minor error message change is visible in this file. The AI summary mentions significant changes in the AllDebridDownloader.get_instant_availability method, which aren't included in this review.

Let's verify if all relevant files are included:

✅ Verification successful

Changes in AllDebrid file processing are now verified

The changes in alldebrid.py show a significant improvement in handling nested directory structures in the instant availability check:

  • Old code: Simple flat processing of files using list comprehension
  • New code: Recursive processing that can handle both files and directories using a nested process_entry function

The changes are complete and align with the PR's objective of fixing "alldebrid instantavail file processing". The modification ensures proper handling of files within nested directory structures in the torrent, which was likely missing in the previous implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for changes in related files

# Look for the AllDebridDownloader class implementation
echo "Searching for AllDebridDownloader implementation:"
rg -l "class AllDebridDownloader"

# Look for get_instant_availability implementations
echo -e "\nSearching for get_instant_availability implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_instant_availability'

Length of output: 369


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the AllDebridDownloader implementation and its get_instant_availability method

echo "Content of src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py:"
cat src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py

# Also check for any recent changes to this file
echo -e "\nRecent changes to alldebrid.py:"
git diff HEAD^1 src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py

Length of output: 11285

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

66-66: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py (2)

135-135: LGTM!

Clean separation of initialization from processing logic.


152-155: Verify the fix for instant availability file processing.

The implementation looks correct, but let's verify that it properly handles all file processing scenarios mentioned in the PR.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about the file processing implementation and test coverage.


Let me search for the process_entry implementation and file processing logic in the alldebrid.py file.


Based on the comprehensive review of the implementation, I can now provide the final response:

The file processing implementation is correctly handling all scenarios

The implementation properly handles both file and directory entries with appropriate error handling:

  • Correctly processes individual files with name, size, and link attributes
  • Handles nested directory structures through recursive processing
  • Creates DebridFile objects only for valid entries
  • Properly aggregates processed files into a TorrentContainer
  • Includes cleanup in the finally block to prevent resource leaks
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for related tests and issues to understand the context of the fix

# Check for related test files
echo "Looking for related test files..."
fd -g "*test*alldebrid*.py"

# Search for related issues or PRs mentioning alldebrid instant availability
echo "Searching for related issues..."
gh issue list --search "alldebrid instant" --state all

# Look for any error handling patterns in the codebase
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg -A 2 "Failed to get (instant|files|torrent)" --type py

Length of output: 2191


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the test implementation for file processing
echo "Checking test implementation..."
cat src/tests/test_alldebrid_downloader.py

# Look for the process_entry function definition
echo "Looking for process_entry implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'def process_entry($$$)'

# Check for any file processing related changes in git history
echo "Checking recent changes..."
git log --oneline -n 5

Length of output: 5776


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in alldebrid.py
echo "Checking alldebrid.py implementation..."
cat src/program/services/downloaders/alldebrid.py

# Look for file processing related patterns
echo "Checking file processing patterns..."
rg -A 5 "process_entry|processed_files|file_entry" --type py

Length of output: 11635

@Gaisberg Gaisberg merged commit d2a6b5b into main Nov 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@Gaisberg Gaisberg deleted the fix/alldebrid branch November 30, 2024 08:37
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants