From 642bdca8521d664501a82a2f7d7c50fb2bd6afd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Moffat Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:29:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed link --- docs/estimating/Risk-First-Analysis.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/estimating/Risk-First-Analysis.md b/docs/estimating/Risk-First-Analysis.md index 87d4dfec6..15c65355a 100644 --- a/docs/estimating/Risk-First-Analysis.md +++ b/docs/estimating/Risk-First-Analysis.md @@ -166,12 +166,12 @@ All I need to do is "weigh up" the change in risks as best as I can. A lot of t So far, we've been looking at each task individually, working out which risks we're addressing, and which ones we're exposed to as a result. If you have plenty of spare talent and only a few tasks, then maybe that's enough and you can get to work on all the tasks that have a positive [Payoff](/tags/Payoff). But if you're constrained, then you should be hunting for the [actions](/tags/Take-Action) with the biggest [Payoff](/tags/Payoff) and doing those first. -Things change too when you have a whole team engaged in the planning process. Although people will generally agree on what the risks _are_, they often will disagree on the [Probability they will occur, or the impact if they do](/thinking/Track-Risk#risk-registers). In cases like these, you might want to allow each stakeholder to "vote up" the risks they consider significant, or vote up the actions they consider to have high [Payoff](/tags/Payoff). This will be covered in further detail in the [next section](Stop-Estimating-Start-Navigating). - -But for now, let's talk about in which ways this is better or worse than Planning Poker. +Things change too when you have a whole team engaged in the planning process. Although people will generally agree on what the risks _are_, they often will disagree on the [Probability they will occur, or the impact if they do](/thinking/Track-Risk#risk-registers). In cases like these, you might want to allow each stakeholder to "vote up" the risks they consider significant, or vote up the actions they consider to have high [Payoff](/tags/Payoff). ## Some Points To Note +Let's talk about in which ways this is better or worse than Planning Poker. + ![Instead of Estimates](/img/generated/estimating/planner/estimates.svg) - **We've made explicit the trade-offs for carrying out pieces of work**. If [building the right thing](Fixing-Scrum#10x) is the most important thing we can do, then making sure the whole team are on the same page with respect to what the pros or cons might be.