Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract Utils.Stack into its own library #18

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

renatomassaro
Copy link
Owner

@renatomassaro renatomassaro commented Dec 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new dependency for stack functionalities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured proper error handling when removing contexts from an empty stack.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test cases to reflect changes in context handling without the Utils.Stack alias.
  • Chores

    • Removed the Utils.Stack module and its associated functions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a significant change in stack management for the Feeb database module. The primary modification involves removing the custom Utils.Stack implementation and adding a new :stack dependency with version ~> 1.0. The changes impact the LocalState module and related test files, removing direct references to the previous stack utility and preparing for a potentially more standardized stack implementation.

Changes

File Change Summary
lib/feeb/db/local_state.ex Removed Utils.Stack alias, maintained core context management logic
lib/feeb/db/utils/stack.ex Entire file deleted, removing custom stack implementation
mix.exs Added :stack dependency with version ~> 1.0
test/db/db_test.exs Removed Utils.Stack alias
test/db/local_state_test.exs Removed Utils.Stack alias

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A Stack of Changes, Hopping Along

Farewell old stack, a new one's in sight
Dependencies shift with algorithmic might
From custom code to library's embrace
Our rabbit leaps with algorithmic grace
A stack reborn, with elegance anew! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4b9b41 and 9011b58.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • mix.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • lib/feeb/db/local_state.ex (0 hunks)
  • lib/feeb/db/utils/stack.ex (0 hunks)
  • mix.exs (1 hunks)
  • test/db/db_test.exs (0 hunks)
  • test/db/local_state_test.exs (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
  • test/db/db_test.exs
  • test/db/local_state_test.exs
  • lib/feeb/db/local_state.ex
  • lib/feeb/db/utils/stack.ex
🔇 Additional comments (1)
mix.exs (1)

58-58: LGTM! Version constraint is appropriate.

The ~> 1.0 version constraint is a good choice as it:

  • Allows patch updates for bug fixes
  • Prevents minor version updates that might introduce breaking changes
  • Provides stability while the migration from internal implementation is validated

@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ defmodule Feeb.DB.Mixfile do
def deps do
[
{:exqlite, "~> 0.23"},
{:stack, "~> 1.0"},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Caution: The stack package shows concerning metrics

The package metrics indicate potential reliability risks:

  • Only 4 total downloads, suggesting very low adoption
  • No release date information available
  • GitHub repository information is unavailable or inaccessible
  • Version 1.0.0 with no subsequent updates

Consider:

  • Evaluating alternative packages with better maintenance and adoption
  • Keeping the custom implementation until a more stable external solution is found
  • If proceeding, pin to exact version 1.0.0 instead of ~> 1.0 to prevent any unexpected updates
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the stack package's stability and maintenance status

The migration from an internal implementation to an external dependency requires careful verification of the package's reliability.

Let's check the package's status:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the stack package's stability and maintenance
# Expected results: Active maintenance, recent releases, and good adoption

# Check latest version and release date
curl -s https://hex.pm/api/packages/stack | jq '{latest_version: .latest_version, latest_release_date: .latest_release_date, downloads: .downloads}'

# Check GitHub activity (if available)
curl -s https://hex.pm/api/packages/stack | jq -r '.meta.links.GitHub' | xargs -I {} curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/{}" | jq '{stargazers_count, open_issues_count, updated_at}'

Length of output: 562

@renatomassaro renatomassaro merged commit 6c3a099 into main Dec 22, 2024
3 of 5 checks passed
@renatomassaro renatomassaro deleted the extract-stack-implementation branch December 22, 2024 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant