Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated Resyntax fixes #480

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes #480

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 7 files.

  • Fixed 10 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-begin-to-cond
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of define-lambda-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of always-throwing-if-to-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of or-hash-ref-set!-to-hash-ref!
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of when-expression-in-for-loop-to-when-keyword
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of quasiquote-to-append
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of inline-unnecessary-begin

resyntax-ci bot added 9 commits February 5, 2025 00:33
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
This expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `hash-ref!` expression.
This `begin` form can be flattened into the surrounding definition context.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.
This quasiquotation is equialent to calling `append`.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
Use the `#:when` keyword instead of `when` to reduce loop body indentation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants