PEP 732: Mark as Active (#3604)

Added the note from SC regarding expanding
the scope to include docstrings in the
standard library.

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

peps/pep-0732.rst

@@ -3,11 +3,12 @@ Title: The Python Documentation Editorial Board
 Author: Joanna Jablonski
 Sponsor: Mariatta Wijaya
 Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-732-the-python-documentation-editorial-board/36710
-Status: Draft
+Status: Active
 Type: Process
 Topic: Governance
 Created: 14-Oct-2023
 Post-History: `20-Oct-2023 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-732-the-python-documentation-editorial-board/36710>`__
+Resolution: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-732-the-python-documentation-editorial-board/36710/9
 
 
 Abstract
@@ -165,6 +166,20 @@ to its operation can be made either through a new PEP or through
 a change to this PEP. In either case, the change would be decided 
 upon by the Steering Council after discussion in the community.
 
+
+PEP Acceptance
+==============
+
+:pep:`732` was `accepted by the Python Steering Council on December 11, 2023
+<https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-732-the-python-documentation-editorial-board/36710/8>`_.
+
+The Steering Council commented that, while they don't disagree with the
+scoping set out in the PEP, it would probably make
+sense for the Editorial Board to consider expanding the scope to include
+docstrings in the standard library, once the Board is sufficiently established
+and the higher priorities have been taken care of.
+
+
 Copyright
 =========