-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathdoktorat_temp3.bib
3311 lines (3311 loc) · 188 KB
/
doktorat_temp3.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
@misc{zinov1973foundations,
address = {Dordrecht},
author = {Zinowjew, Aleksander},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Otero et al. - 1968 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {90 277 0193 8},
publisher = {D. Reidel Publishing Company},
series = {Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science},
title = {{Foundations of the Logical Theory of Scientific Knowledge (Complex Logic)}},
url = {https://books.google.pl/books?id=GoYLAQAAIAAJ},
year = {1973}
}
@book{Zinowjew1976,
abstract = {t{\l}um. Z. Simbierowicz},
address = {Warszawa},
author = {Zinowjew, Aleksander},
publisher = {Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN},
title = {{Logika nauki}},
year = {1976}
}
@article{Yadav2016,
abstract = {Apophaticism in mainstream analytic theology and philosophy of religion has come to denote a metaphysical and semantic thesis: that, due to divine transcendence, God is ineffable, inconceivable, or incomprehensible. But this conception fails to properly take account of the central claim of apophaticism as a special type of mystical theology. As such, the apophatic commitments to divine ineffability (however understood) are instrumental. More fundamental is the function of theological ignorance to uniquely inform the task of theology and transform the theologian in union with God. Taking Jonathan Jacobs' recent account as a test case, I argue that reconstructions of apophaticism need to be supplemented by an account of this informational and personally transformative value that apophatic mysticism places on its commitment to divine incomprehensibility. I supply the needed account of apophatic valuing in terms of wonder as the appropriate emotional attitude toward divine transcendence.},
author = {Yadav, Sameer},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Yadav - 2016 - Mystical Experience and the Apophatic Attitude Sameer.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1800172400},
issn = {2330-2380},
journal = {Journal of Analytic Theology},
number = {1},
pages = {17--43},
title = {{Mystical Experience and the Apophatic Attitude Sameer}},
url = {https://journals.tdl.org/jat/index.php/jat/article/view/jat.2016-4.180017240021a/279},
volume = {4},
year = {2016}
}
@book{Wright1959,
address = {Helsinki},
author = {Wright, G H},
series = {Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes physico-mathematicae, XXII, 4},
title = {{On the Logic of Negation, by G.H. Von Wright}},
url = {https://books.google.pl/books?id=JkAGtAEACAAJ},
year = {1959}
}
@misc{WoodhullJennifer,
author = {{Woodhull, Jennifer}, G.},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Woodhull, Jennifer - Unknown - Decoding Mystical Rhetoric Scholars, Mystics And Silence.docx:docx},
title = {{Decoding Mystical Rhetoric: Scholars, Mystics And Silence}}
}
@article{Wolfson1952,
author = {Wolfson, Harry Austryn},
doi = {10.1017/S0017816000020769},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wolfson - 1952 - Albinus and Plotinus on divine attributes.pdf:pdf},
issn = {14754517},
journal = {Harvard Theological Review},
number = {2},
pages = {115--130},
title = {{Albinus and Plotinus on divine attributes}},
volume = {45},
year = {1952}
}
@article{10.2307/1451300,
author = {Wolfson, Harry Austryn},
doi = {10.2307/1451300},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wolfson - 2019 - Crescas on the Problem of Divine Attributes.pdf:pdf},
issn = {00216682, 15530604},
journal = {The Jewish Quarterly Review},
number = {2},
pages = {175--221},
publisher = {[University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]},
title = {{Crescas on the Problem of Divine Attributes}},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/1451300},
volume = {7},
year = {1916}
}
@article{Wolenski1993,
author = {Wole{\'{n}}ski, Jan},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/logika/Wole{\'{n}}ski-samozwrotno{\'{s}}{\'{c}} i prawdom{\'{o}}wca.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Filozofia Nauki},
number = {1},
pages = {89--102},
title = {{Samozwrotno{\'{s}}{\'{c}} i odrzucanie}},
volume = {1},
year = {1993}
}
@article{Wolenski2000,
author = {Wole{\'{n}}ski, Jan},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wole{\'{n}}ski - 2000 - Czy Le{\'{s}}niewski by{\l} filozofem.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Filozofia Nauki},
number = {3-4},
pages = {57--68},
title = {{Czy Le{\'{s}}niewski by{\l} filozofem?}},
volume = {8},
year = {2000}
}
@incollection{Wolenski2013,
address = {Krak{\'{o}}w},
author = {Wole{\'{n}}ski, Jan},
booktitle = {Logic in Theology},
editor = {Bro{\.{z}}ek, Bartosz and Olszewski, Adam and Hohol, Mateusz},
pages = {11--38},
publisher = {Copernicus Center Press},
title = {{Theology and Logic}},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Wolenski2005,
author = {Wole{\'{n}}ski, Jan},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/Metateoretyczne problemy epistemologii.pdf:pdf},
issn = {17335566},
journal = {Diametros},
number = {6},
pages = {70--93},
title = {{Metateoretyczne problemy epistemologii}},
volume = {6},
year = {2005}
}
@article{Wolak2005,
abstract = {The Cracow Circle was a group of four Polish philosophers and logicians (Salamucha, Boche{\'{n}}ski, Drewnowski, Soboci{\'{n}}ski) connected with Lvov-Warsaw School. They tried to apply the modern logic to a Christian thought. This application first needed explication what the mathematical logic really is—not a science connected with the Aristotelian abstraction of the second degree but formal science unnecessary in a strict reasoning and defining. Then they showed how important was always exactness in Christian thought and wrote some papers in which the modern logic was used in different issues (maybe the most famous was Salamucha's analysis of Thomas' proof ex motu of the existence of God). Cracow Circle was also strongly interested in relations between science and religion, they tried to show and explore new ways to develop Christian, especially catholic, views of the world, philosophy and theology. Very interesting was Drewnowski's philosophical program and its applications in various problems in philosophy, theology, sociology etc.},
author = {Wolak, Zbigniew},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/pawel_polak,+zfn36_5_wolak.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce},
keywords = {Boles{\l}aw Soboci{\'{n}}ski,Cracow Circle,Franciszek Drewnowski,Jan Salamucha,J{\'{o}}zef Maria Boche{\'{n}}ski,Lvov-Warsaw School,logic in theology,science and religion},
number = {36},
pages = {97--122},
title = {{Naukowa filozofia Ko{\l}a Krakowskiego}},
year = {2005}
}
@article{Wojtowicz2001,
author = {Wojtowicz, Krzysztof},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/PF_2001_R10_1_14_Wojtowicz-K_O-pojeciu.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Przegl{\c{a}}d Filozoficzny — Nowa Seria},
number = {1(37)},
pages = {121--138},
title = {{Krzysztof Wojtowicz O poj{\c{e}}ciu „zobowi{\c{a}}zania ontologicznego”}},
year = {2001}
}
@book{Wittgenstein2011,
abstract = {t{\l}um. B. Wolniewicz},
address = {Warszawa},
author = {Wittgenstein, Ludwig},
publisher = {Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN},
title = {{Tractatus logico-philosophicus}},
year = {2011}
}
@book{Whitehead1910,
address = {Cambridge},
author = {Whitehead, Alfred North and Russell, Bertrand},
booktitle = {The American Mathematical Monthly},
doi = {10.2307/2300015},
issn = {00029890},
number = {4},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
title = {{Principia Mathematica.}},
volume = {35},
year = {1910}
}
@incollection{Wansing2001,
address = {Malden – Oxford},
author = {Wansing, Heinrich},
booktitle = {The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic},
doi = {10.1111/b.9780631206934.2001.00021.x},
editor = {Goble, Lou},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wansing - 2007 - The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9780631206934},
pages = {415--436},
publisher = {Blackwell Publishing},
title = {{Negation}},
year = {2001}
}
@article{Wansing2002,
abstract = {The knowability paradox is an instance of a remarkable reasoning pattern (actually, a pair of such patterns), in the course of which an occurrence of the possibility operator, the diamond, disappears. In the present paper, it is pointed out how the unwanted disappearance of the diamond may be escaped. The emphasis is not laid on a discussion of the contentious premise of the knowability paradox, namely that all truths are possibly known, but on how from this assumption the conclusion is derived that all truths are, in fact, known. Nevertheless, the solution offered is in the spirit of the constructivist attitude usually maintained by defenders of the anti-realist premise. In order to avoid the paradoxical reasoning, a paraconsistent constructive relevant modal epistemic logic with strong negation is defined semantically. The system is axiomatized and shown to be complete. {\textcopyright} 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers.},
author = {Wansing, Heinrich},
doi = {10.1023/A:1021256513220},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Wansing - 2002 - Diamonds are a philosopher's best friends The knowability paradox and modal epistemic relevance logic.pdf:pdf},
issn = {15730433},
journal = {Journal of Philosophical Logic},
keywords = {Constructive negation,Epistemic logic,Knowability paradox,Modal logic,Paraconsistent logic,Relevance logic},
number = {6},
pages = {591--612},
title = {{Diamonds are a philosopher's best friends: The knowability paradox and modal epistemic relevance logic}},
volume = {31},
year = {2002}
}
@book{Wansing1996,
abstract = {Negation: A Notion in Focus (Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy, Bd 7)},
booktitle = {Perspektiven der Analytischen Philosophie. Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy, Band 7},
edition = {Berlin and},
editor = {Wansing, Heinrich},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Unknown - 1996 - Negation A Notion in Focus.pdf:pdf},
keywords = {negation},
pages = {270},
publisher = {Walter de Gruyter},
title = {{Negation: A Notion in Focus}},
volume = {7},
year = {1996}
}
@article{VanDitmarsch2012,
abstract = {Fitch showed that not every true proposition can be known in due time; in other words, that not every proposition is knowable. Moore showed that certain propositions cannot be consistently believed. A more recent dynamic phrasing of Moore-sentences is that not all propositions are known after their announcement, i.e., not every proposition is successful. Fitch's and Moore's results are related, as they equally apply to standard notions of knowledge and belief (S 5 and KD45, respectively). If we interpret 'successful' as 'known after its announcement' and 'knowable' as 'known after some announcement', successful implies knowable. Knowable does not imply successful: there is a proposition $\phi$ that is not known after its announcement but there is another announcement after which $\phi$ is known. We show that all propositions are knowable in the more general sense that for each proposition, it can become known or its negation can become known. We can get to know whether it is true: $\delta$(K$\phi$ v K{\^{A}}¬$\phi$). This result comes at a price. We cannot get to know whether the proposition was true. This restricts the philosophical relevance of interpreting 'knowable' as 'known after an announcement'. {\textcopyright} 2011 Stiftelsen Theoria.},
author = {{Van Ditmarsch}, Hans and {Van Der Hoek}, Wiebe and Iliev, Petar},
doi = {10.1111/j.1755-2567.2011.01119.x},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/logika/Everything is Knowable Moores problem.pdf:pdf},
issn = {17552567},
journal = {Theoria},
keywords = {Fitch's paradox,dynamic epistemics,knowability,modal logic,public announcements},
number = {2},
pages = {93--114},
title = {{Everything is knowable - How to get to know whether a proposition is True}},
volume = {78},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Urbanczyk2016,
abstract = {This paper provides moderate criticism of so-called normative theories of thinking and reasoning. The discussion focuses on the problems of idealization, adequacy, inconsistent yet non-trivial logics, logical omniscience etc. I called them “internal” to the normative approach, because they stem from the very properties of formal systems used to model these two human activities. Some arguments, however, refer to the current theories in cognitive science, including those which are developed within “descriptive” framework.},
author = {Urba{\'{n}}czyk, Piotr},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/problems of Normative theories of thinking and Reasoning.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce)},
keywords = {and reasoning,logic,normative theories of thinking,normative theories of thinking and reasoning,probability,rational choice theory,theory},
number = {60},
pages = {35--52},
title = {{“Internal” Problems of Normative Theories of Thinking and Reasoning}},
year = {2016}
}
@article{Urbanczyk2014,
author = {Urba{\'{n}}czyk, Piotr},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/Zagadnienia_Filozoficzne_w_Nauce-r2014-t-n56-s33-56.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce},
number = {56},
pages = {33--56},
title = {{Geneza intuicjonistycznego rachunku zda{\'{n}} i Twierdzenie Gliwienki}},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Urbanczyk2018,
abstract = {In this paper I present four interpretations of so-called negative theology and provide a number of attempts to model this theory within a formal system. Unfortunately, all of them fail in some manner. Most of them are simply inconsistent, some contradict the usual religious praxis and discourse, and some do not correspond to the key theses of negative theology. I believe that this paper shows how challenging this theory is from a logical perspective.},
author = {Urba{\'{n}}czyk, Piotr},
doi = {10.2478/slgr-2018-0022},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Urba{\'{n}}czyk - 2018 - The logical challenge of negative theology.pdf:pdf;:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Urba{\'{n}}czyk - 2018 - The logical challenge of negative theology(2).pdf:pdf},
issn = {0860150X},
journal = {Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric},
keywords = {apophatic theology,logic,negation,negative theology,paradoxes,self-reference},
number = {1},
pages = {149--174},
title = {{The logical challenge of negative theology}},
volume = {54},
year = {2018}
}
@article{Urbanczyk2013,
author = {Urba{\'{n}}czyk, Piotr},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/logika teologia.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce},
number = {57},
pages = {143--151},
title = {{Logika i teologia}},
year = {2013}
}
@book{Tworak2004,
abstract = {seria Fliozofia i logika nr 89},
address = {Pozna{\'{n}}},
author = {Tworak, Zbigniew},
publisher = {Wydawnistwo Naukowe UAM},
title = {{K{\l}amstwo k{\l}amcy i zbi{\'{o}}r zbior{\'{o}}w. O problemie antynomii}},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Tworak2011,
author = {Tworak, Zbigniew},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/logika/Tworak - paradoks znawcy.pdf:pdf},
issn = {1230-6894},
journal = {Filozofia Nauki},
keywords = {ARITHMETIC,KNOWER PARADOX,KNOWLEDGE,PROVABILITY LOGIC,SELF-REFERENCE},
number = {3(75)},
pages = {29--47},
title = {{Paradoks znawcy (The Knower Paradox)}},
volume = {19},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Turon2007,
author = {Turo{\'{n}}, Agnieszka},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Turo{\'{n}} - 2007 - O negacji.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Czasopismo Filozoficzne},
number = {2},
pages = {75--85},
title = {{O negacji}},
year = {2007}
}
@article{Tromans2020,
abstract = {This article examines the influential analogical schemas of David Burrell and John Milbank. While Milbank emphasises that analogy must be understood as primarily an ontological doctrine, much of Burrell's work focuses on semantic rather than ontological issues. Milbank has strongly criticised one of Burrell's early books for construing Aquinas too much in terms of the agnosticism of Kant. It is demonstrated, however, that Burrell is increasingly led in his reading of Aquinas to acknowledge the necessity of a similitude of participation between creatures and God. Analysis of the disagreement between Burrell and Milbank shows one of the reasons why the via analogia matters. We need not privilege the apophatic over the cataphatic, nor the cataphatic over the apophatic. The way of analogy transcends this unpalatable either/or. As relying on the proper exercises, on practical know-how, analogy allows theology a powerful pedagogical tool to govern God-talk, while yet affirming the continual revelation and discovery of something ever-greater.},
author = {Tromans, Oliver},
doi = {10.1111/heyj.13282},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/filozofia teol (neg)/analogy - etween kata and apo.pdf:pdf},
issn = {14682265},
journal = {Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology},
number = {5},
pages = {749--762},
title = {{Similarity Within (Ultimate) Dissimilarity: Burrell and Milbank on the Interplay of Positive and Negative Theology}},
volume = {61},
year = {2020}
}
@article{Triebitz2016,
abstract = {Seiring dengan kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi yang menjadi pusat perhatian dunia. Maka manusia dituntut untuk menciptakan peralatan-peralatan canggih untuk teknologi muktahir. Baik itu dalam bidang bisnis, perdagangan, kesehatan, militer, pendidikan, komunikasi dan budaya maupun bidang-bidang lainnya. Maka teknologi ini membawa perubahan pada peralatan-peralatan yang dulunya bekerja secara analog mulai dikembangkan secara digital, dan bahkan yang bekerjanya secara manual sekarang banyak dikembangkan secara otomatis, seperti kamera digital, handycam, dan sebagainya, dalam pembacaan pengukuran juga sudah dikembangkan ke dalam teknik digital. Contohnya perangkat Load Cell. Dan keuntungan menggunakan Load Cell adalah untuk mempermudah dalam pembacaan data untuk meminimalkan kesalahan dalam pembacaan data yang disebabkan adanya human error.Pada pemilihan Load Cell bertujuan untuk memilih kecocokan dalam membuat rancang bangun alat uji tarik kapasitas 3 ton, dimana dalam pemilihan ini kami memilih jenis load cell “S” karna alat yang kita rancang adalah uji tarik bukan uji tekan. Dengan kapasitas load cell 5 ton. Untuk membuat jarak aman dalam pengujian specimen ST41. Load Cell menggunakan system perangkat elektronik pengolahan data yang menjadi sebuah kurva tegangan regangan. Data-data yang diperoleh tersebut berupa besarnya pembebanan hasil dari pengujian specimen ST41. Kata},
author = {Triebitz, Meir},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Triebitz - 2016 - Rambam's Theory of Negative Theology Divine Creation and Human Interpretation.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {2013206534},
number = {July},
pages = {1--23},
title = {{Rambam's Theory of Negative Theology: Divine Creation and Human Interpretation}},
year = {2016}
}
@article{464620,
author = {Tkaczyk, Marcin},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Tkaczyk - 2014 - Grahama Priesta metoda uzasadniania tezy dialeteizmu.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne},
number = {2},
pages = {23--35},
title = {{Grahama Priesta metoda uzasadniania tezy dialeteizmu}},
volume = {27},
year = {2014}
}
@incollection{Tipton2012,
author = {Tipton, Ian},
booktitle = {British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment},
doi = {10.4324/9780203715123},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Tipton - 2012 - Locke Knowledge and its limits.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9780203715123},
pages = {69--95},
title = {{Locke: Knowledge and its limits}},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Tichy1978,
author = {Tichy, Pavel},
issn = {00030481},
journal = {American Philosophical Quarterly},
month = {may},
number = {4},
pages = {275--284},
publisher = {[North American Philosophical Publications, University of Illinois Press]},
title = {{Questions, Answers, and Logic}},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009725},
volume = {15},
year = {1978}
}
@book{Thomason1974,
abstract = {Formal Philosophy. The formal language applied to philosophical argumentation},
address = {New Haven and London},
author = {Thomason, Richmond H. and Montague, Richard},
booktitle = {Language},
doi = {10.2307/412917},
editor = {Thomason, Richmond H.},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/Richard Montague - Formal Philosophy_ Selected Papers (1974).pdf:pdf},
isbn = {0300015275},
issn = {00978507},
number = {4},
publisher = {Yale University Press},
title = {{Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague}},
volume = {53},
year = {1974}
}
@article{Thomason1972,
author = {Thomason, R. H.},
doi = {10.1007/BF00650499},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Thomason - 1972 - A semantic theory of sortal incorrectness.pdf:pdf},
issn = {00223611},
journal = {Journal of Philosophical Logic},
number = {2},
pages = {209--258},
title = {{A semantic theory of sortal incorrectness}},
volume = {1},
year = {1972}
}
@incollection{Thijssen2018,
author = {Thijssen, Hans},
booktitle = {The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {Winter 201},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/condemnation/},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{Condemnation of 1277}},
year = {2018}
}
@article{Tennessen1959,
author = {Tennessen, Herman},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/Tennesson1959.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Synthese},
number = {4},
pages = {369--388},
title = {{Logical Oddities and Locutional Scarcities: Another Attack upon Methods of Revelation}},
volume = {11},
year = {1959}
}
@article{Teahan1978,
author = {Teahan, John F.},
doi = {10.1086/486631},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Teahan - 1978 - A Dark and Empty Way Thomas Merton and the Apophatic Tradition.pdf:pdf},
issn = {0022-4189},
journal = {The Journal of Religion},
number = {3},
pages = {263--287},
title = {{A Dark and Empty Way: Thomas Merton and the Apophatic Tradition}},
volume = {58},
year = {1978}
}
@incollection{Tarski2001,
abstract = {t{\l}um. J. Zygmunt},
address = {Warszawa},
author = {Tarski, Alfred},
booktitle = {Pisma logiczno-filozoficzne, t. 2: Metalogika},
pages = {31--92},
publisher = {Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN},
title = {{Podstawowe poj{\c{e}}cia metodologii nauk dedukcyjnych}},
year = {2001}
}
@book{Tarski1933,
author = {Tarski, Alfred},
booktitle = {Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, Wydzia{\l} III Nauk Matematyczno-Fizycznych},
number = {34},
title = {{Pojecie Prawdy W Jezykach Nauk Dedukcyjnych}},
year = {1933}
}
@article{Tarski1935,
author = {Tarski, Alfred},
journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
number = {1},
pages = {177--198},
title = {{Zur Grundlegung der Boole'schen Algebra I}},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/212745},
volume = {24},
year = {1935}
}
@incollection{sep-fundamentality,
author = {Tahko, Tuomas E},
booktitle = {The {Stanford} Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {{F}all 201},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {\url{https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/fundamentality/}},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{Fundamentality}},
year = {2018}
}
@incollection{Tahko2018,
author = {Tahko, Tuomas E},
booktitle = {The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {Fall 2018},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/fundamentality/},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{Fundamentality}},
year = {2018}
}
@article{Synowiecki1994,
author = {Synowiecki, Adam},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/Studia_Philosophiae_Christianae-r1994-t30-n2-s245-271 (1).pdf:pdf},
journal = {Studia Philosophiae Christianae},
number = {2},
pages = {245--271},
title = {{Od mitu o nauce do powagi naukowej, cz. I}},
volume = {30},
year = {1994}
}
@article{Swinburne2014,
abstract = {Although Gregory wrote very little about this. he acknowledged that natural reason can lead us from the orderliness of the physical world to the existence of God; in this, he followed the tradition of Athanasius and other Greek fathers. Unlike Aquinas, he did not seek to present the argument a; deductive: in fact his argument is inductive, and of die same kind as - we now realize - scientists and historians use when they argue from phenomena to then explanatory cause. Gregory wrote hardly anything about how one could obtain knowledge of the truths of the Christian revelation by arguments from non-question-beggining premises; but in his conversations with the Turks he showed that he believed that there are good arguments of this kind. Almost all of Gregory's writing about knowledge of God concerned how one could obtain this by direct access in prayer: this access, he held is open especially to monks, but to a considerable degree also to all Christians who follow the divine commandments.},
author = {Swinburne, Richard},
doi = {10.2478/sh-2014-0001},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Swinburne - 2014 - Gregory Palamas and our Knowledge of God.pdf:pdf},
issn = {2299-0518},
journal = {Studia Humana},
number = {1},
pages = {3--12},
title = {{Gregory Palamas and our Knowledge of God}},
volume = {3},
year = {2014}
}
@article{Strozewski1967,
author = {Str{\'{o}}{\.{z}}ewski, W{\l}adys{\l}aw},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Str{\'{o}}{\.{z}}ewski - 1967 - Ontologiczna problematyka negacji w De quatuor oppositis, Cz{\c{e}}{\'{s}}{\'{c}} 1.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Studia Mediewistyczne},
pages = {183--246},
title = {{Z historii problematyki negacji, cz. 1: Ontologiczna problematyka negacji w „De quatuor oppositis”}},
volume = {8},
year = {1967}
}
@article{Stone1936,
author = {Stone, Marshall Harvey},
doi = {10.2307/1989664},
issn = {00029947},
journal = {Transactions of the American Mathematical Society},
number = {1},
pages = {37},
title = {{The Theory of Representation for Boolean Algebras}},
volume = {40},
year = {1936}
}
@article{Stepien2013,
author = {St{\c{e}}pie{\'{n}}, Tomasz},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/hybris_20_2013_Stepien_083_108.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris},
number = {20},
pages = {83--108},
title = {{Znany – Nieznany B{\'{o}}g . Uwagi Na Temat Rozwoju Doktryny Niepoznawalno{\'{s}}ci Boga U}},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Stepien1994,
author = {St{\c{e}}pie{\'{n}}, Tomasz},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/St{\c{e}}pie{\'{n}} - 1994 - Teologia negatywna w pismach Corpus Areopagiticum.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9788572051293},
journal = {Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne},
pages = {231--255},
title = {{Teologia negatywna w pismach ,,Corpus Areopagiticum''}},
volume = {7},
year = {1994}
}
@article{Stern2014,
abstract = {In the present piece we defend predicate approaches to modality, that is approaches that conceive of modal notions as predicates applicable to names of sentences or propositions, against the challenges raised by Montague's theorem. Montague's theorem is often taken to show that the most intuitive modal principles lead to paradox if we conceive of the modal notion as a predicate. Following Schweizer (J Philos Logic 21:1-31, 1992) and others we show this interpretation of Montague's theorem to be unwarranted unless a further non trivial assumption is made-an assumption which should not be taken as a given. We then move on to showing, elaborating on work of Gupta (J Philos Logic 11:1-60, 1982), Asher and Kamp (Properties, types, and meaning. Vol. I: foundational issues, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 85-158, 1989), and Schweizer (J Philos Logic 21:1-31, 1992), that the unrestricted modal principles can be upheld within the predicate approach and that the predicate approach is an adequate approach to modality from the perspective of modal operator logic. To this end we develop a possible world semantics for multiple modal predicates and show that for a wide class of multimodal operator logics we may find a suitable class of models of the predicate approach which satisfies, modulo translation, precisely the theorems of the modal operator logic at stake. {\textcopyright} 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.},
author = {Stern, Johannes},
doi = {10.1007/s10670-013-9523-7},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/Montagues Theorem and Modal Logic.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1067001395237},
issn = {15728420},
journal = {Erkenntnis},
number = {3},
pages = {551--570},
title = {{Montague's Theorem and Modal Logic}},
volume = {79},
year = {2014}
}
@incollection{Stang2013,
address = {Malden – Oxford},
author = {Stang, Charles M.},
booktitle = {The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Christian Mysticism},
doi = {10.1002/9781118232736.ch11},
editor = {Lamm, Julia A.},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Stang - 2013 - Negative Theology from Gregory of Nyssa to Dionysius the Areopagite.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9781444332865},
issn = {0929-6212},
pages = {161--176},
publisher = {Blackwell Publishing},
title = {{Negative Theology from Gregory of Nyssa to Dionysius the Areopagite}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2569-x},
year = {2013}
}
@book{Stace1952,
address = {Princeton},
author = {Stace, Walter Terence},
isbn = {0837118670},
publisher = {Princeton University Press},
title = {{Time and Eternity: An Essay in the Philosophy of Religion}},
year = {1952}
}
@book{Stace1961,
address = {London},
author = {Stace, Walter Terence},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Capelle - 2004 - Philosophy and Mysticism.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9780874774160},
publisher = {Macmillan \& CO LTD},
title = {{Mysticism and Philosophy}},
url = {https://books.google.pl/books?id=VxJ5AAAAMAAJ},
year = {1961}
}
@article{Spychalska2011,
author = {Spychalska, Maria},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Spychalska - 2011 - Processing of sentences with predicate negation The role of opposite predicates.pdf:pdf},
keywords = {negation,opposites,predicate,processing},
title = {{Processing of sentences with predicate negation: The role of opposite predicates}},
url = {http://web.stanford.edu/$\sim$danlass/esslli2011stus/spychalska.pdf},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Speranza2010,
abstract = {The history of scholarship on negation tracks and illuminates the major developments in the history of metaphysics, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind, from Parmenides, Plato and Aristotle through Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein to contemporary formal theorists. Our perspective focuses on the catalytic role played by the 20th century philosopher of language Paul Grice, whose views on negation serve as a fulcrum for his attempt to bridge the (neo-)Traditionalist and Formalist traditions in logical thought. Grice's remarks on negation and speaker meaning and the elaboration of his ideas by subsequent neo-Griceans are summarized and situated within a broader picture of the role of contradictory and contrary negation in the frameworks of Aristotelians, Medievals, early modern schoolmaster-logicians, 19th and early 20th century neo-Idealists and Formalists, Oxford ordinary-language analytics, practitioners of classical and non-classical logics, and a range of other philosophers and linguists. Particular attention is paid to the relations between negation and the other operators of propositional and predicate calculus. Implications for accounts of the semantics and pragmatics of natural language are also pursued and extensive references to related work are provided. {\textcopyright} 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
author = {Speranza, J. L. and Horn, Laurence R.},
doi = {10.1016/j.jal.2010.04.001},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Speranza, Horn - 2010 - A brief history of negation.pdf:pdf},
issn = {15708683},
journal = {Journal of Applied Logic},
keywords = {Asymmetry of affirmation and negation,Contradictory negation,Contrary negation,Grice,Modernists,Negation,Neo-Traditionalists},
number = {3},
pages = {277--301},
publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},
title = {{A brief history of negation}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2010.04.001},
volume = {8},
year = {2010}
}
@book{Soskice1985,
address = {Oxford},
author = {Soskice, Janet Martin},
publisher = {Clarendon Press},
title = {{Metaphor and Religious Language}},
year = {1985}
}
@incollection{sep-epistemic-paradoxes,
author = {Sorensen, Roy},
booktitle = {The {Stanford} Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {{S}pring 2},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {\url{https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/epistemic-paradoxes/}},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{Epistemic Paradoxes}},
year = {2022}
}
@article{Sommers1971,
author = {Sommers, Fred},
doi = {10.1007/BF02378925},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Sommers - 1971 - Structural ontology.pdf:pdf},
issn = {00483893},
journal = {Philosophia},
number = {1-2},
pages = {21--42},
title = {{Structural ontology}},
volume = {1},
year = {1971}
}
@incollection{Sommers1965-SOMP-2,
author = {Sommers, Fred},
booktitle = {Philosophy in America},
editor = {Black, Max},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Sommers - 1965 - Predicability.pdf:pdf},
pages = {262--281},
publisher = {Ithaca: Cornell University Press},
title = {{Predicability}},
year = {1965}
}
@incollection{Small2002ReflectionsOG,
author = {Small, Christopher G},
booktitle = {Klarheit in Religionsdingen. Aktuelle Beitr{\"{a}}ge zur Religionsphilosophie, Band III of Grundlagenprobleme unserer Zeit},
isbn = {978-3-936522-44-0},
pages = {109--144},
publisher = {Leipziger Universit{\"{a}}tsverlag},
title = {{Reflections on G{\"{o}}del's Ontological Argument}},
year = {2003}
}
@incollection{Slobin1996,
address = {Cambridge University Press},
author = {Slobin, Dan I.},
booktitle = {Rethinking linguistic relativity},
editor = {Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S.},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/(Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17) John J. Gumperz, Stephen C. Levinson - Rethinking Linguistic Relativity-Cambridge University Press (1996) - SLOBIN.pdf:pdf},
pages = {70--96},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
title = {{From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”}},
year = {1996}
}
@book{Skowron2021,
address = {Warszawa},
author = {Skowron, Bart{\l}omiej},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/rozprawa.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9788381562782},
publisher = {Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej},
title = {{Cz{\c{e}}{\'{s}}{\'{c}} i ca{\l}o{\'{s}}{\'{c}}. W stron{\c{e}} topoontologii}},
year = {2021}
}
@article{Skarga1998,
author = {Skarga, Barbara},
journal = {Kwartalnik Filozoficzny},
number = {4},
pages = {5--20},
title = {{Teologia negatywna a cz{\l}owiek}},
volume = {26},
year = {1998}
}
@book{Sikora2010,
address = {Krak{\'{o}}w},
author = {Sikora, Piotr},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Sikora - 2010 - Logos Niepoj{\c{e}}ty.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {978-83-242-1421-1},
pages = {267},
publisher = {Universitas},
title = {{Logos Niepoj{\c{e}}ty}},
year = {2010}
}
@book{Sider2011,
abstract = {In order to perfectly describe the world, it is not enough to speak truly. One must also use the right concepts - including the right logical concepts. One must use concepts that carve at the joints', that give the world's *structure*. There is an objectively correct way to "write the book of the world". Metaphysics, as traditionally conceived, is about the fundamental nature of reality; in the present terms, metaphysics is about the world's structure. Metametaphysics - inquiry into the status of metaphysical questions - turns on structure. The question of whether ontological, causal, or modal questions are "substantive" is in large part a question of whether the world has ontological, causal, and modal structure - whether quantifiers, causal relations, and modal operators carve at the joints.},
author = {Sider, Theodore},
booktitle = {Writing the Book of the World},
doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Sider - Unknown - Writing the Book of the World.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9780191732096},
keywords = {Carving at the joints,Fundamentality,Ground,Metametaphysics,Metaontology,Natural property,Objectivity,Realism,Structure,Substantivity},
pages = {1--336},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
title = {{Writing the Book of the World}},
year = {2011}
}
@article{Shramko2005,
abstract = {We consider a logic which is semantically dual (in some precise sense of the term) to intuitionistic. This logic can be labeled as "falsification logic": it embodies the Popperian methodology of scientific discovery. Whereas intuitionistic logic deals with constructive truth and non-constructive falsity, and Nelson's logic takes both truth and falsity as constructive notions, in the falsification logic truth is essentially non-constructive as opposed to falsity that is conceived constructively. We also briefly clarify the relationships of our falsification logic to some other logical systems. {\textcopyright} Springer 2005.},
author = {Shramko, Yaroslav},
doi = {10.1007/s11225-005-8474-7},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Shramko - 2005 - Dual intuitionistic logic and a variety of negations The logic of scientific research.pdf:pdf},
issn = {00393215},
journal = {Studia Logica},
keywords = {Dual intuitionistic logic,Falsification,Kite of negations,Verification},
number = {2-3},
pages = {347--367},
title = {{Dual intuitionistic logic and a variety of negations: The logic of scientific research}},
volume = {80},
year = {2005}
}
@article{Shaw2013,
author = {Shaw, James R.},
doi = {10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00530.x},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/filozofia teol (neg)/shaw truth paaradox ineffaable.pdf:pdf},
issn = {00318205},
journal = {Philosophy and Phenomenological Research},
number = {1},
pages = {64--104},
title = {{Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions}},
volume = {86},
year = {2013}
}
@book{Sells1994,
abstract = {The subject of Mystical Languages of Unsaying is an important but neglected mode of mystical discourse, apophasis. which literally means "speaking away." Sometimes translated as "negative theology," apophatic discourse embraces the impossibility of naming something that is ineffable by continually turning back upon its own propositions and names. In this close study of apophasis in Greek, Christian, and Islamic texts, Michael Sells offers a sustained, critical account of how apophatic language works, the conventions, logic, and paradoxes it employs, and the dilemmas encountered in any attempt to analyze it.This book includes readings of the most rigorously apophatic texts of Plotinus, John the Scot Eriugena, Ibn Arabi, Marguerite Porete, and Meister Eckhart, with comparative reference to important apophatic writers in the Jewish tradition, such as Abraham Abulafia and Moses de Leon. Sells reveals essential common features in the writings of these authors, despite theirwide-ranging differences in era, tradition, and theology.By showing how apophasis works as a mode of discourse rather than as a negative theology, this work opens a rich heritage to reevaluation. Sells demonstrates that the more radical claims of apophatic writers—claims that critics have often dismissed as hyperbolic or condemned as pantheistic or nihilistic—are vital to an adequate account of the mystical languages of unsaying. This work also has important implications for the relationship of classical apophasis to contemporary languages of the unsayable. Sells challenges many widely circulated characterizations of apophasis among deconstructionists as well as a number of common notions about medieval thought and gender relations in medieval mysticism.},
address = {London, Chicago},
author = {Sells, Michael A.},
booktitle = {Journal of the American Oriental Society},
doi = {10.2307/606227},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Sells - 1994 - Mystical Languages of Unsaying.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {0226747867},
issn = {00030279},
number = {3},
pages = {484},
publisher = {The University of Chicago Press},
title = {{Mystical Languages of Unsaying}},
volume = {115},
year = {1994}
}
@incollection{sep-maimonides,
author = {Seeskin, Kenneth},
booktitle = {The {Stanford} Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {{S}pring 2},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {\url{https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/maimonides/}},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{Maimonides}},
year = {2021}
}
@article{Sedlar2019,
abstract = {We provide a formalization of Aristotelian term negation within an extension of classical first-order logic by two predicate operators. The operators represent the range of application of a predicate and the term negation of a predicate, respectively. We discuss several classes of models for the language characterised by various assumptions concerning the interaction between range of application, term negation and Boolean complementation. We show that the discussed classes can be defined by sets of formulas. In our intended class of models, term negation of P corresponds to the complement of P relative to the range of application of P. It is an established fact about term negation that it does not satisfy the principle of Conversion by Contraposition. This seems to be in conflict with the thesis, put forward by Lenzen and Berto, that contraposition is a minimal requirement for an operator to be a proper negation. We show that the arguments put forward in support of this thesis do not apply to term negation.},
author = {Sedl{\'{a}}r, Igor and Ebela, Karel},
doi = {10.2143/LEA.247.0.3287264},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/logika/Internal_External_Negation_Sedlar.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Logique et Analyse},
pages = {265--284},
title = {{Term Negation in First-Order Logic}},
volume = {247},
year = {2019}
}
@article{Scott2016,
abstract = {Apophaticism - the view that God is both indescribable and inconceivable - is one of the great medieval traditions of philosophical thought about God, but it is largely overlooked by analytic philosophers of religion. This paper attempts to rehabilitate apophaticism as a serious philosophical option. We provide a clear formulation of the position, examine what could appropriately be said and thought about God if apophaticism is true, and consider ways to address the charge that apophaticism is self-defeating. In so doing we draw on recent work in the philosophy of language, touching on issues such as the nature of negation, category mistakes, fictionalism, and reductionism.},
author = {Scott, Michael and Citron, Gabriel},
doi = {10.24204/ejpr.v8i4.1716},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Scott, Citron - 2016 - What is apophaticism Ways of talking about an ineffable God.pdf:pdf},
issn = {16898311},
journal = {European Journal for Philosophy of Religion},
number = {4},
pages = {23--49},
title = {{What is apophaticism? Ways of talking about an ineffable God}},
volume = {8},
year = {2016}
}
@book{Schumann2012,
abstract = {RESUMEN. Numerosos textos y art{\'{i}}culos proporcionan gu{\'{i}}as sobre c{\'{o}}mo escribir art{\'{i}}culos acad{\'{e}}micos. El objetivo de este documento, en particular, consiste en centrarse en las t{\'{e}}cnicas m{\'{a}}s recientes al respecto que pueden ser consideradas por los autores a la hora de escribir o revisar textos. Utilizando ejemplos mayoritariamente sacados de los n{\'{u}}meros recientes de International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology (IJCHP), se comentan nuevas aproximaciones a la presentaci{\'{o}}n de t{\'{i}}tulos, res{\'{u}}menes, orientaciones para la lectura, introducciones, m{\'{e}}todos, resultados, tablas, figuras y conclusiones. Es m{\'{a}}s, d{\'{o}}nde resulta apropiado, se hace referencia a las posibles diferencias en los estilos de autores espa{\~{n}}oles y anglosajones, dado que IJCHP publica art{\'{i}}culos en ambos idiomas. Parece que hay varias maneras de mejorar este aspecto particular de escritura acad{\'{e}}mica, aunque algunas de {\'{e}}stas pueden parecer m{\'{a}}s aceptables para la escritura de los autores bien establecidos en comparaci{\'{o}}n con los m{\'{a}}s novatos, sobre todo si escriben en su segundo idioma. PALABRAS CLAVE. Escritura acad{\'{e}}mica. T{\'{i}}tulos. Resumen estructurado. Cuadros de texto. ABSTRACT. Numerous texts and articles provide guidelines on how to write academic articles. The aim of this particular paper, however, is to focus on more recent techniques in this respect that authors might like to consider when they are writing and revising text. Using examples mainly drawn from recent issues of the International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology (IJCHP), I discuss new approaches to the presentation of titles, abstracts, reader 1 Los autores agradecen a Andrew Knipe por su ayuda t{\'{e}}cnica y a otros colegas quienes han ayudado en este art{\'{i}}culo.},
booktitle = {Logic in Orthodox Christian Thinking},
doi = {10.1515/9783110320626},
editor = {Schumann, Andrew},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Unknown - 2012 - Logic in Orthodox Christian Thinking.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9783868381795},
title = {{Logic in Orthodox Christian Thinking}},
year = {2012}
}
@incollection{sep-linguistics,
author = {Scholz, Barbara C and Pelletier, Francis Jeffry and Pullum, Geoffrey K and Nefdt, Ryan},
booktitle = {The {Stanford} Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {{S}pring 2},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {\url{https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/linguistics/}},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{Philosophy of Linguistics}},
year = {2022}
}
@article{Schlamm1992,
author = {Schlamm, Leon},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Schlamm - 1992 - Numinous Experience and Religious Language.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Religious Studies},
number = {4},
pages = {533--551},
title = {{Numinous Experience and Religious Language}},
volume = {28},
year = {1992}
}
@book{Salerno2009,
abstract = {In 1945, Alonzo Church issued a pair of referee reports in which he anonymously conveyed to Frederic Fitch a surprising proof showing that wherever there is (empirical) ignorance there is also logically unknowable truth. Fitch published this and a generalization of the result in 1963. Ever since, philosophers have been attempting to understand the significance and address the counter-intuitiveness of this, the so-called paradox of knowability. This book assembles Church's referee reports, Fitch's 1963 paper, and nineteen new papers on the knowability paradox. The book contains a general introduction to the paradox and the background literature, and is divided into seven sections that roughly mark the central points of debate. The sections include the history of the paradox, Michael Dummett's constructivism, issues of paraconsistency, developments of modal and temporal logics, Cartesian restricted theories of truth, modal and mathematical fictionalism, and reconsiderations about how, and whether, we ought to construe an anti-realist theory of truth.},
address = {New York},
author = {Salerno, Joe},
doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285495.001.0001},
editor = {Salerno, Joe},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/Joe Salerno - New Essays on the Knowability Paradox-Oxford University Press, USA (2009).pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9780191713972},
keywords = {Alonzo Church,Constructivism,Factionalism,Frederic fitch,Ignorance,Knowability paradox,Logic,Paraconsistency,Truth},
pages = {1--392},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
title = {{New Essays on the Knowability Paradox}},
year = {2009}
}
@incollection{Rybarkiewicz2020,
abstract = {Bibliotheca Philosophica},
address = {{\L}{\'{o}}d{\'{z}}},
author = {Rybarkiewicz, Dorota},
booktitle = {Analiza, racjonalno{\'{s}}{\'{c}}, filozofia religii. Ksi{\c{e}}ga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Ryszardowi Kleszczowi},
doi = {10.18778/8220-034-8.26},
editor = {Maciaszek, Janusz},
file = {:D\:/Pobrane/375-385 Rybarkiewicz.pdf:pdf},
pages = {375--385},
publisher = {Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu {\L}{\'{o}}dzkiego},
title = {{Dialeteizm punktem spotkania Boga religii z Bogiem filozof{\'{o}}w? Uwag kilka: wi{\c{e}}cej pyta{\'{n}} ni{\.{z}} odpowiedzi}},
volume = {6},
year = {2020}
}
@book{Russell1903,
address = {Cambridge},
author = {Russell, Bertrand},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Russell - 1903 - The Principles of Mathematics.pdf:pdf},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
title = {{The Principles of Mathematics}},
url = {https://people.umass.edu/klement/pom},
year = {1903}
}
@article{Russell1936,
author = {Russell, Bertrand},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Russell - 1936 - The Limits of Empiricism.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society},
pages = {131--150},
title = {{The Limits of Empiricism}},
volume = {36},
year = {1936}
}
@article{Ruczaj2012,
author = {Ruczaj, Stanis{\l}aw},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Ruczaj - 2012 - Analogia i apofatyczny pazur.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Pressje},
number = {29},
pages = {280--284},
title = {{Analogia i apofatyczny pazur}},
year = {2012}
}
@article{Rowe1999,
abstract = {Conceptualising the religious history of Rome and the Roman Empire seems to be easy. Looking back to that period, we usually differentiate Christianity, Judaism, and the rest. We are used to differentiating different 'religions', even if it is difficult to provide a precise term for those we mean to refer to by 'the rest'. The term 'polytheism' is frequently used, but it reflects the perspective of people who regard themselves as monotheists, starting from the Alexandrian Jewish philosopher Philo. The discipline of Religious Studies has developed a terminology of 'cults' and 'denominations', but the terminological choice itself implies normative statements of 'inside' and 'outside'. This article deals with the main lines of thought that determined political and juridical and religious action on a larger scale, focusing on Cicero, religio in texts of the third and fourth centuries CE, how to express a plurality of religious groups, and proliferation and control of religious plurality.},
author = {Rowe, William L.},
doi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211524.013.0048},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rowe - 1999 - Religious Pluralism.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {9780191743962},
journal = {Religious Studies},
keywords = {Cicero,Cults,Denominations,Polytheism,Religions,Religious groups,Religious history,Religious plurality,Roman empire,Rome},
number = {2},
pages = {139--150},
title = {{Religious Pluralism}},
volume = {35},
year = {1999}
}
@article{Roszak2015,
author = {Roszak, Piotr},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Roszak - 2015 - Dwie pr{\c{e}}dko{\'{s}}ci teologii o celu, metodzie i perspektywach teologii analitycznej.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Teologia w Polsce},
number = {2},
pages = {75--93},
title = {{Dwie pr{\c{e}}dko{\'{s}}ci teologii? o celu, metodzie i perspektywach teologii analitycznej}},
volume = {9},
year = {2015}
}
@book{Rorem1993,
address = {Oxford and New York},
author = {Rorem, Paul},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rorem - 1993 - Pseudo-Dionysius. A Commentary on the Texts and an Introduction to Their Influence.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {0195076648},
publisher = {Ox},
title = {{Pseudo-Dionysius. A Commentary on the Texts and an Introduction to Their Influence}},
year = {1993}
}
@article{Rorem2008,
abstract = {So many postmodern theologians are busy retrieving "negative theology," while others label such retrievals "misconstruals," that observers might be tempted to conclude that there was, or is, such a single thing as "negative theology." Yet anyone seeking a definition or even sampling relevant texts encounters a diverse array of premodern apophatic authors with a multiplicity of negative theologies. I here survey some of the diverse strands of Christian negative theology and argue in favor of one strand of that tradition in relation to Christ, the incarnation, and the cross. Copyright {\textcopyright} President and fellows of Harvard college 2008.},
author = {Rorem, Paul},
doi = {10.1017/S0017816008001958},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rorem - 2008 - Negative Theologies and the Cross.pdf:pdf},
issn = {00178160},
journal = {Harvard Theological Review},
number = {3-4},
pages = {451--464},
title = {{Negative Theologies and the Cross}},
volume = {101},
year = {2008}
}
@incollection{Rojek2013,
author = {Rojek, Pawe{\l}},
booktitle = {Logic in Orthodox Christian Thinking},
doi = {10.1515/9783110320626.38},
editor = {Schumann, Andrew},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rojek - 2013 - The Logic of Palamism.pdf:pdf},
issn = {2299-0518},
pages = {38--81},
publisher = {De Gruyter, 2012},
title = {{The Logic of Palamism}},
year = {2013}
}
@incollection{Rojek2013a,
author = {Rojek, Pawe{\l}},
booktitle = {Logic in Religious Discourse},
doi = {10.1515/9783110319576.192},
editor = {Schumann, Andrew (Ed.)},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rojek - 2013 - Towards a Logic of Negative Theology.pdf:pdf},
pages = {192--215},
publisher = {Ontos Verlag},
title = {{Towards a Logic of Negative Theology}},
year = {2013}
}
@article{Rojek2012,
author = {Rojek, Pawe{\l}},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rojek - 2012 - Logika teologii negatywnej.pdf:pdf},
journal = {Pressje},
number = {29},
pages = {216--231},
title = {{Logika teologii negatywnej}},
year = {2012}
}
@book{Rocca2004,
abstract = {Gregory Rocca's nuanced discussion prevents Aquinas's thought from being capsulized in familiar slogans and is an antidote to unilateralist or monochrome views about God-talk. {\textcopyright} 2004 The Catholic University of America Press. All rights reserved.},
address = {Washington D.C.},
author = {Rocca, Gregory P.},
booktitle = {Speaking the Incomprehensible God: Thomas Aquinas on the Interplay of Positive and Negative Theology},
doi = {10.5860/choice.42-2171},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rocca - 2004 - Speaking the incomprehensible god Thomas Aquinas on the interplay of positive and negative theology.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {0813213673},
issn = {0009-4978},
pages = {1--412},
publisher = {The Catholic University of America Press},
title = {{Speaking the incomprehensible god: Thomas Aquinas on the interplay of positive and negative theology}},
year = {2004}
}
@incollection{Richard1967,
address = {Cambridge},
author = {Richard, Jules},
booktitle = {From Frege to G{\"{o}}del. A source book in mathematical logic 1879–1931},
editor = {van Heijenoort, Jean},
file = {:D\:/doktorat/zwiazane/richard-problem.pdf:pdf},
pages = {142--144},
publisher = {Harvard University Press},
title = {{The principles of mathematics and the problem of sets}},
year = {1967}
}
@incollection{sep-language-thought,
author = {Rescorla, Michael},
booktitle = {The {Stanford} Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {{S}ummer 2},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {\url{https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/language-thought/}},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{The Language of Thought Hypothesis}},
year = {2019}
}
@incollection{sep-logic-epistemic,
author = {Rendsvig, Rasmus and Symons, John},
booktitle = {The {Stanford} Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
edition = {{S}ummer 2},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N},
howpublished = {\url{https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/logic-epistemic/}},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
title = {{Epistemic Logic}},
year = {2021}
}
@article{Redmond1990,
abstract = {The organ of no single institution or sectarian school, philosophical or religious, the International Journal for Philosophy of Religion provides a medium for the exposition, development, and criticism of important philosophical insights and theories relevant to religion in any of its varied forms. It also provides a forum for critical, constructive, and interpretative consideration of religion from an objective philosophical point of view. Articles, symposia, discussions, reviews, notes, and news in this journal are intended to serve the interests of a wide range of thoughtful readers, especially teachers and students of philosophy, philosophical theology and religious thought. Unsolicited book reviews are not accepted for publication in the International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. If you would like to review a book for the journal, please contact the Book Review Editor: Kevin Schilbrack Department of Philosophy and Religion Western Carolina University 226-A Stillwell Cullowhee, NC28723 USA Email: kschilbrack@wcu.edu},
author = {Redmond, Walter},
doi = {10.1007/BF00143575},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Redmond - 1990 - A logic of faith.pdf:pdf},
issn = {15728684},
journal = {International Journal for Philosophy of Religion},
number = {3},
pages = {165--180},
title = {{A logic of faith}},
volume = {27},
year = {1990}
}
@incollection{Rea2020,
author = {Rea, Michael C.},
booktitle = {Essays in Analytic Theology},
doi = {10.1093/oso/9780198866800.003.0007},
file = {:C\:/Users/Piotr/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rea - 2020 - God beyond Being.pdf:pdf},
month = {nov},
pages = {120--138},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
title = {{God beyond Being}},
volume = {I},
year = {2020}
}
@article{Ramsey1926,
annote = {https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-25.1.338},
author = {Ramsey, Frank Plumpton},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-25.1.338},
issn = {0024-6115},
journal = {Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society},
month = {jan},
number = {1},
pages = {338--384},
publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
title = {{The Foundations of Mathematics}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-25.1.338},
volume = {s2-25},
year = {1926}
}
@incollection{Ramsey1990,