You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
i looked at the chi2/ndf plots of the linear fit in the Vcal calibration because they looked suspicious and found a bug in /Analyse/TestResultClasses/CMSPixel/QualificationGroup/XrayCalibration/VcalCalibrationModule/VcalCalibrationROC/VcalCalibrationROC.py (master branch)
the real chi2/ndf is not saved as 'value' but as 'sigma' with the same value than the offset:
Furthermore:
The errors we assume are probably too small that's why we get large values of chi2/ndf. If instead of the statistical error of the fit, a constant error of 0.4 Vcal (RMS of a reproducibility study I have done) is used for the peak position, the order of magnitude of the chi2/ndf becomes much better. But before using such constant it should be checked by other test centers if they obtain the same result.
In principle I think we should also consider an error of the conversion from gammas to electrons in silicon, but I haven't found any information on this yet and will search for it. If it is very small we can neglect it of course.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
i looked at the chi2/ndf plots of the linear fit in the Vcal calibration because they looked suspicious and found a bug in /Analyse/TestResultClasses/CMSPixel/QualificationGroup/XrayCalibration/VcalCalibrationModule/VcalCalibrationROC/VcalCalibrationROC.py (master branch)
the real chi2/ndf is not saved as 'value' but as 'sigma' with the same value than the offset:
Furthermore:
The errors we assume are probably too small that's why we get large values of chi2/ndf. If instead of the statistical error of the fit, a constant error of 0.4 Vcal (RMS of a reproducibility study I have done) is used for the peak position, the order of magnitude of the chi2/ndf becomes much better. But before using such constant it should be checked by other test centers if they obtain the same result.
In principle I think we should also consider an error of the conversion from gammas to electrons in silicon, but I haven't found any information on this yet and will search for it. If it is very small we can neglect it of course.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: