Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

finish todos in box constraint solver #45

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Huangzizhou
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f49f693) 84.75% compared to head (b878cce) 88.10%.

Files Patch % Lines
src/polysolve/JSONUtils.hpp 82.60% 4 Missing ⚠️
src/polysolve/nonlinear/BoxConstraintSolver.cpp 92.30% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #45      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.75%   88.10%   +3.34%     
==========================================
  Files          45       46       +1     
  Lines        1804     1824      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits         1529     1607      +78     
+ Misses        275      217      -58     
Flag Coverage Δ
polysolve 88.10% <86.84%> (+3.34%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Huangzizhou Huangzizhou requested a review from teseoch November 23, 2023 21:16
@teseoch
Copy link
Member

teseoch commented Nov 24, 2023

could you add an unit test for that stuff?

@Huangzizhou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added tests. Did some changes to box constraint solver to make MMA work.

@Huangzizhou Huangzizhou merged commit c9510c1 into main Nov 25, 2023
@Huangzizhou Huangzizhou deleted the fix-box-constraint branch November 25, 2023 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants