Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subdomain now uses php logo font. #1

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kadet1090
Copy link
Contributor

Subdomain title on header now uses font from PHP logo (Handel Gothic - Included as webfont).
2014-06-09_20-07-25

@bjori
Copy link
Member

bjori commented Jun 9, 2014

Isn't there a licensing issue using that font?
Do you know how that works? Whom can we request permission to use it?

I really like the idea btw.

@Sobak
Copy link
Contributor

Sobak commented Jun 9, 2014

It would be a problem if the font has licensing restrictions because as far as I can see we're using this font in our logo already. I also fully supports this change, it looks better than now.

@kadet1090
Copy link
Contributor Author

Font is licensed but as Sobak said, it is already used in PHP logo, so I assume that php group owns rights to use it.

@salathe
Copy link
Contributor

salathe commented Jun 9, 2014

Having a license to use a font in the creation of a logo is an entirely different thing to distributing the font files on the web.

Could you include the LICENSE file that you got with this font to ensure that we are indeed allowed to use these files?

@kadet1090
Copy link
Contributor Author

In that case it would be just better (and easier :D) to use some similar but open font. Ubuntu looks quite good in my opinion:
2014-06-09_23-13-03
I've already commited changes.

@bjori
Copy link
Member

bjori commented Jun 9, 2014

I'd prefer to stick with Handel Gothic and figure out the licensing issue.

@salathe
Copy link
Contributor

salathe commented Jun 9, 2014

Licensing one of the Handel Gothic's as a web font is likely going to be prohibitively expensive. Most providers provide a license based on a number of page views, which for php.net is going to be… a lot.

For example; fonts.com would be £35/mo limited to 1,000,000 page views (with a wide font range). myfonts.com is £92.51 for 1,000,000 page views. The latter is just for one style within the family (ITC Handel Gothic Std Medium)! Lots of places won't even offer a license for hosting the files ourselves.

Unless we can come to an agreement with one of the providers, it will be much more cost-effective to skip the web font approach and create images (I like SVG) as needed. "Desktop" licensing is far, far less expensive.

I admit, it would be nice to have the sub-site names matching, or at least fitting very neatly with, the PHP logo. I'm totally open to suggestion!

@bjori
Copy link
Member

bjori commented Jun 9, 2014

Surely someone created the font and we could license it directly rather then a middleman?
I don't quite understand how the whole font licensing works, which is why I'm asking :)

Are there two players that own it and can license it at will at any price they so choose?

@Bilge
Copy link

Bilge commented Aug 31, 2024

Congratulations on your 10 year anniversary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants