Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug: NCA intervals are based on actual cycles (DOSNO) or standard TAU, not on nominal ones #161

Open
Gero1999 opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Bug: NCA intervals are based on actual cycles (DOSNO) or standard TAU, not on nominal ones #161

Gero1999 opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Gero1999
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

The current implementation is using a set and estimated TAU for multiple dose studies. After #138 intervals are customized based on the actual cycle (DOSNO; dose number). However, we want to split them based on a "nominal" cycle, that can be defined using NFRLT and NRRLT.

Still in process of thinking the best implementation and tbd.

To reproduce

Expected behaviour
@Gero1999 Gero1999 added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 16, 2025
@Gero1999 Gero1999 moved this to Backlog in aNCA Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
aNCA
Status: Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Gero1999