Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Jest to hold ring #72

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024
Merged

Add Jest to hold ring #72

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

gunzip
Copy link
Contributor

@gunzip gunzip commented Feb 6, 2024

  • I've added a short description of the entry that
    clarifies what it does and why it's useful
  • I've added links to the entry's documentation and/or
    website
  • My frontmatter is correct, complete and follows the
    format specified in the README
  • In case the entry is in the adopt category: I've
    added at least one reference to showcase the entry usage
    among our organization
  • I've described at least one use case for the entry

@gunzip gunzip requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2024 09:05
@francescopersico
Copy link

If we are still evaluating (trial) other testing frameworks like Vitest i suggest to maintain Jest to adopt ring.
If we are confident that Vitest is the solution we want to adopt, is ok to hold Jest.

@gunzip
Copy link
Contributor Author

gunzip commented Feb 6, 2024

Vitest is being proposed in adopt ring https://github.com/pagopa/technology-radar/pull/71/files

@gunzip gunzip merged commit adbbf2f into main Feb 8, 2024
3 checks passed
@gunzip gunzip deleted the jest branch February 8, 2024 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants