React flow #41
React flow #41
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance a React application's flow management system, focusing on state handling, UI components, and functionality for a workflow editor. Key modifications include the integration of Zustand for state management, adjustments to node and edge components for improved interactivity and visual representation, and the introduction of a Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 12
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (12)
- dev-start.sh (1 hunks)
- src/components/flow/components/new.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/flow/edge/general.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/components/flow/edge/no.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/flow/edge/yes.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/flow/form.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/flow/node/action.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/flow/node/condition.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/flow/node/new.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/components/flow/workflow.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/pages/app/test_case/testcase.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/stores/flow.store.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
src/components/flow/node/action.tsx (1)
- 23-36: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [10-33]
The logic for determining
bgColorbased ondata.payload.type_fieldand its application in the JSX for dynamic styling is a good enhancement. This approach improves the component's visual feedback to the user based on the node's type.src/components/flow/node/condition.tsx (1)
- 19-24: The updates to the
ConditionalNodecomponent, including the new content structure and styling, enhance the visual representation and clarity of condition nodes. These changes are well-implemented and follow best practices.src/pages/app/test_case/testcase.tsx (4)
- 12-12: The import of
flowStateSelectoranduseFlowStorefrom"stores/flow.store"is correctly added to leverage the new state management logic. Ensure that the rest of the application is updated to use these imports where necessary to maintain consistency across the codebase.- 115-127: The use of
useFlowStorewith theflowStateSelectorandshallowfor state management is a good practice for optimizing re-renders. This approach ensures that the component only subscribes to the necessary pieces of state and updates when those specific pieces change.- 133-133: The
setGraphfunction is correctly used to update the graph data based on the fetched test case data. This demonstrates an effective use of the new state management logic to dynamically update the workflow visualization based on external data.- 322-322: Rendering the
Workflowcomponent without passing nodes and edges directly is a good practice, as it leverages the Zustand store for state management. This approach decouples the component from its parent and allows it to independently subscribe to state changes, improving modularity and maintainability.
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
| npm install | |||
| npm startgit c | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seems to be a typo in the command npm startgit c. It likely should be npm start to correctly start the project.
- npm startgit c
+ npm startCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| npm startgit c | |
| npm start |
| return ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <BaseEdge id={id} path={edgePath} style={{ backgroundColor: "black" }} /> | ||
| <EdgeLabelRenderer> | ||
| {/* <EdgeLabelRenderer> | ||
| <div | ||
| style={{ | ||
| position: "absolute", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [26-41]
Commented-out code found. If this code is not intended for future use, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean. If it might be used later, please add a comment explaining the conditions under which it should be re-enabled.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| classNames; | ||
| }, [data]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The useEffect hook is used here without a clear purpose, as it only references classNames without performing any operations. If the intention was to trigger side effects based on specific dependencies, please include those dependencies in the dependency array. If this useEffect is not needed, consider removing it.
| export type RFState = { | ||
| nodes: Node<any>[]; | ||
| edges: Edge[]; | ||
| graph: any[]; | ||
| onNodesChange: OnNodesChange; | ||
| onEdgesChange: OnEdgesChange; | ||
| onConnect: OnConnect; | ||
| setNodes: (nodes: Node[]) => void; | ||
| setEdges: (edges: Edge[]) => void; | ||
| setGraph: (graph: any[]) => void; | ||
| rearrangeNodePosition: () => void; | ||
| addNewNode: (nodes: Node[]) => void; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The RFState type definition includes a method addNewNode that accepts an array of Node[] but doesn't seem to use its parameter within its implementation (lines 148-150). This could potentially be a mistake or an oversight. Consider revising the method's implementation to utilize the passed parameter or adjust the method's signature if the parameter is unnecessary.
| setGraph: (graph: any[]) => { | ||
| set({ graph }); | ||
| let nodes: Array<any> = []; | ||
| let edges: Array<any> = []; | ||
| generateNodeAndEdge(graph || [], nodes, edges); | ||
| set({ nodes, edges }); | ||
| get().rearrangeNodePosition(); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The setGraph function recalculates the entire graph layout every time it's called, which could lead to performance issues for large graphs. Consider optimizing this process by checking if the graph has actually changed before recalculating the layout, or by implementing more efficient update mechanisms.
| const blockType: any = { | ||
| Assertion: "actionNode", | ||
| Condition: "conditionalNode", | ||
| YesCase: "yes", | ||
| NoCase: "no" | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The blockType object is a good approach to map block types to specific node types. However, consider defining this object as a TypeScript enum or a constant with a more specific type than any to improve type safety and code readability.
| const data = [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: "ca037150-1fcd-4cd0-a571-b17c4fd59279", | ||
| execution_order: 1, | ||
| kind: "Reference", | ||
| type_field: "ActionGroup", | ||
| reference: "34dce227-c8cd-4f01-8ed9-68aacc9bde9d", | ||
| parent_id: null, | ||
| case_id: "8b72b6d1-f3a7-4d3e-9dbb-150b5eb0c060", | ||
| children: [] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: "764cc9dc-48fb-487f-a612-c717c80910d4", | ||
| execution_order: 3, | ||
| kind: "Reference", | ||
| type_field: "Assertion", | ||
| reference: "456dea53-4a87-45d4-b05d-47f531a2f483", | ||
| parent_id: null, | ||
| case_id: "8b72b6d1-f3a7-4d3e-9dbb-150b5eb0c060", | ||
| children: [] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: "1d70658d-0fb1-4035-afaa-f5544c51dbc6", | ||
| execution_order: 4, | ||
| kind: "SelfReference", | ||
| type_field: "Condition", | ||
| reference: null, | ||
| parent_id: null, | ||
| case_id: "8b72b6d1-f3a7-4d3e-9dbb-150b5eb0c060", | ||
| children: [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: "f884e857-7cd7-4412-88f7-f85813545dbe", | ||
| execution_order: 1, | ||
| kind: "SelfReference", | ||
| type_field: "YesCase", | ||
| reference: null, | ||
| parent_id: "1d70658d-0fb1-4035-afaa-f5544c51dbc6", | ||
| case_id: "8b72b6d1-f3a7-4d3e-9dbb-150b5eb0c060", | ||
| children: [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: "c48ef0d2-cbeb-4158-8a7c-41cabe99df59", | ||
| execution_order: 1, | ||
| kind: "Reference", | ||
| type_field: "ActionGroup", | ||
| reference: "34dce227-c8cd-4f01-8ed9-68aacc9bde9d", | ||
| parent_id: "f884e857-7cd7-4412-88f7-f85813545dbe", | ||
| case_id: "8b72b6d1-f3a7-4d3e-9dbb-150b5eb0c060", | ||
| children: [] | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: "873f030f-eea6-48bc-86e0-84a66b86b8a3", | ||
| execution_order: 2, | ||
| kind: "SelfReference", | ||
| type_field: "NoCase", | ||
| reference: null, | ||
| parent_id: "1d70658d-0fb1-4035-afaa-f5544c51dbc6", | ||
| case_id: "8b72b6d1-f3a7-4d3e-9dbb-150b5eb0c060", | ||
| children: [] | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: "80b11882-c23f-4b46-9349-f6b194010387", | ||
| execution_order: 2, | ||
| kind: "Reference", | ||
| type_field: "ActionGroup", | ||
| reference: "8a05b852-e46c-4a37-b745-b30ba725179b", | ||
| case_id: "8b72b6d1-f3a7-4d3e-9dbb-150b5eb0c060", | ||
| children: [] | ||
| } | ||
| ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The hardcoded data array is used for testing or demonstration purposes. If this data is meant to be static, consider moving it to a separate file or a mock data module to keep the component file focused on logic and presentation. If it's temporary, ensure it's replaced with dynamic data fetching from an API or a similar data source in the final implementation.
| // nodes: Array<any>, | ||
| // edges: Array<any>, | ||
| // derivedEdge: any = undefined | ||
| // ) => { | ||
| // let _blockType = blockType[item.type_field] || "actionNode"; | ||
| // if (derivedEdge != undefined) { | ||
| // edges.push({ | ||
| // ...derivedEdge, | ||
| // id: `${derivedEdge?.id}_to_${_blockType}${item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "defaultE", | ||
| // target: `${_blockType}${item.id}` | ||
| // }); | ||
| // } | ||
| // nodes.push({ | ||
| // id: `${_blockType}${item.id}`, | ||
| // type: _blockType, | ||
| // position: { x: 0, y: 300 }, | ||
| // data: { payload: item } | ||
| // }); | ||
| // if (_blockType == blockType.Assertion) { | ||
| // edges.push({ | ||
| // id: `edge_${_blockType}_${item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "defaultE", | ||
| // source: `${_blockType}${item.id}`, | ||
| // target: `addBlock${item.id}` | ||
| // }); | ||
| // nodes.push({ | ||
| // id: `addBlock${item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "newNode", | ||
| // position: { x: 0, y: 0 }, | ||
| // data: {} | ||
| // }); | ||
| // derivedEdge = { | ||
| // id: `edge_newNode_${_blockType}_${item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "defaultE", | ||
| // source: `addBlock${item.id}` | ||
| // }; | ||
| // } else if (_blockType == blockType.Condition) { | ||
| // // looping child action | ||
| // let child = item.children; | ||
| // if (child != undefined && child.length > 0) { | ||
| // // generateNodeAndEdge(child, ) | ||
| // child.map((child_item: any, _child_index: number) => { | ||
| // let field_type = blockType[child_item.type_field] || "actionNode"; | ||
|
|
||
| // nodes.push({ | ||
| // id: `addBlock${field_type}${child_item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "newNode", | ||
| // position: { x: 0, y: 0 }, | ||
| // data: {} | ||
| // }); | ||
|
|
||
| // edges.push({ | ||
| // id: `edge_nde_${field_type}_${child_item.id}`, | ||
| // type: field_type, | ||
| // sourceHandle: field_type, | ||
| // source: `${_blockType}${item.id}`, | ||
| // target: `addBlock${field_type}${child_item.id}` | ||
| // }); | ||
| // derivedEdge = { | ||
| // id: `edge_newNode_${field_type}_${child_item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "defaultE", | ||
| // source: `addBlock${field_type}${child_item.id}` | ||
| // }; | ||
| // // derivedEdge = { | ||
| // // id: `edge_newNode_${field_type}_${item.id}`, | ||
| // // type: blockType[field_type], | ||
| // // sourceHandle: blockType[field_type], | ||
| // // source: `addBlock${item.id}` | ||
| // // }; | ||
| // let _derivedEdge = generateNodeAndEdge( | ||
| // child_item.children, | ||
| // nodes, | ||
| // edges, | ||
| // derivedEdge | ||
| // ); | ||
|
|
||
| // edges.push({ | ||
| // ..._derivedEdge, | ||
| // id: `${_derivedEdge?.id}_to_${field_type}${item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "defaultE", | ||
| // target: `addBlock_endBlockConstion_${item.id}` | ||
| // }); | ||
| // }); | ||
| // } | ||
|
|
||
| // nodes.push({ | ||
| // id: `addBlock_endBlockConstion_${item.id}`, | ||
| // type: "newNode", | ||
| // position: { x: 0, y: 0 }, | ||
| // data: {} | ||
| // }); | ||
| // } | ||
|
|
||
| // let child = item.children; | ||
| // if (child != undefined && child.length > 0) { | ||
| // // generateNodeAndEdge(child, ) | ||
| // } | ||
| // return derivedEdge; | ||
| // }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented-out code, such as the processNode and generateNodeAndEdge functions, should be removed if it's no longer needed. Keeping commented-out code can clutter the codebase and lead to confusion about what code is active. If this code might be needed for future reference, consider documenting its purpose or moving it to a separate file or documentation.
| // const addNewNode = (nodes: Array<any>, edges: Array<any>) => { | ||
| // nodes.push({ | ||
| // id: "addNode", | ||
| // type: "newNode", | ||
| // position: { x: 0, y: 30 }, | ||
| // data: {} | ||
| // }); | ||
| // nodes.push({ | ||
| // id: "intial", | ||
| // type: "actionNode", | ||
| // position: { x: 0, y: 30 }, | ||
| // data: {} | ||
| // }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The commented-out addNewNode function suggests an attempt to add new nodes to the workflow. If this functionality is required, consider implementing it properly within the new state management logic. Otherwise, remove the commented-out code to keep the codebase clean.
| // const constructWorkflow = (caseblock: any) => { | ||
| // // let nodes: Array<any> = []; | ||
| // // let edges: Array<any> = []; | ||
| // // let currentEdge: any = undefined; | ||
| // // generateNodeAndEdge(caseblock.case_execution || [], nodes, edges); | ||
| // // if (nodes.length == 0) { | ||
| // // addNewNode(nodes, edges); | ||
| // // } | ||
| // // // console.log("edge"); | ||
| // // // console.log(edges); | ||
| // // // console.log("node"); | ||
| // // // console.log(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(nodes))); | ||
| // // setNodes(nodes); | ||
| // // setEdges(edges); | ||
| // // rearrangeNodePosition(); | ||
| // }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The commented-out constructWorkflow function appears to be part of the previous implementation for constructing the workflow. Since the logic has been refactored to use the new state management approach, ensure that any necessary functionality from this function is integrated into the new approach and remove the commented-out code.
Summary by CodeRabbit
WorkflowFormcomponent for displaying job position and transaction details.flow.store.