new dropdown and added service list for test suite #64
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 4
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docker-compose.ymlis excluded by:!**/*.yml
Files selected for processing (10)
- web/src/core/components/dropdown/dropdown.css (1 hunks)
- web/src/core/components/dropdown/index.jsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/core/components/flow/components/new.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/core/components/flow/form.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/src/core/components/flow/node/new.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/pages/app/test_case/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- web/src/service/app/test_case.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/service/app/test_suit.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/service/endpoint.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
web/src/index.tsx (1)
- 13-18: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
Ensure that the removal of
<React.StrictMode>is intentional and consider the implications it may have on debugging and detecting side effects in component lifecycles. Reevaluate if its removal aligns with the application's development and debugging practices.web/src/core/components/flow/form.tsx (1)
- 58-68: The integration of
SearchableDropdownlooks correct. However, ensure that thehandleChangefunction properly updates the relevant state or performs necessary actions when a new option is selected. It's also important to validate thatdataSourceandactionGroupare correctly managed and updated elsewhere in the component.web/src/core/components/dropdown/dropdown.css (1)
- 1-100: The CSS for the
SearchableDropdowncomponent is well-structured and follows common practices for styling dropdown components. Ensure that the color schemes, margins, paddings, and other properties align with the application's design system and accessibility guidelines.web/src/core/components/flow/components/new.tsx (1)
- 14-28: The temporary removal or restructuring of "Loop," "If Condition," and "Block" options is noted. Ensure that this change aligns with the application's current requirements and that any related functionality is appropriately adjusted or disabled. Consider adding a comment or TODO to revisit this change if it's intended to be temporary.
web/src/pages/app/test_case/index.tsx (1)
- 127-132: The refactoring of
fetchTestCasetogetCaseListand the integration offetchTestCasesare correctly implemented. Ensure that thegetCaseListfunction is called appropriately throughout the component to keep the data source updated. Also, consider handling potential errors fromfetchTestCasesto improve the user experience in case of failures.web/src/service/endpoint.ts (1)
- 29-29: The addition of the
batchUpdateendpoint is a significant update that supports the PR's objective of improving test suite management. It's crucial to ensure that the implementation of this endpoint on the backend correctly handles batch updates to avoid potential data inconsistencies.Verification successful
The search results have provided us with detailed insights into the implementation of the
batchUpdateendpoint across different parts of the application. Specifically, we found references to thebatchUpdatefunctionality in the context of suites, cases, actions, and data tables. Each of these references points to a distinct implementation that handles batch updates in its respective domain within the application.
Suites: The
batch_update_suite_blockfunction incrates/services/api/src/service/app/suit.rsand its corresponding route incrates/services/api/src/route/app/suit.rsindicate that the application supports batch updates for suite blocks. This function takes a suite ID and a list of blocks to be updated, ensuring that batch operations on suites are supported.Cases: Similarly, the
batch_update_case_blockfunction and its route suggest that batch updates for case blocks are implemented, allowing for efficient management of case-related data in bulk.Actions and Profiles: The references to batch updates in the context of actions and profiles (
batch_update_actionand related functions) demonstrate the application's capability to handle batch operations across various entities, enhancing the overall efficiency and flexibility of data management.Data Tables: The
batch_update_datafunction incrates/services/api/src/service/app/datatable.rsand its route indicate support for batch updates in data tables, which is crucial for managing large volumes of structured data efficiently.These findings confirm that the backend implementation of the
batchUpdateendpoint is comprehensive, covering multiple aspects of the application's functionality. The implementation details suggest that the application is equipped to handle batch updates efficiently, which is essential for maintaining data consistency and supporting scalable operations.Given the evidence from the codebase, it is clear that the backend implementation of the
batchUpdateendpoint has been thoroughly addressed across different components of the application. This supports the PR's objective of improving test suite management and ensures that the application can handle batch updates effectively.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the backend implementation of the batchUpdate endpoint. # This script is a placeholder and should be replaced with specific verification steps. echo "Verify the backend implementation of the batchUpdate endpoint."Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the batchUpdate endpoint in the backend code. rg "/api/v1/app/.*/suite/.*/batch/update" -A 10Length of output: 861
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find potential handlers for the batchUpdate endpoint. rg "batch.*update" -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 35304
web/src/core/components/flow/node/new.tsx (1)
- 30-44: The temporary removal or restructuring of "Loop," "If Condition," and "Assertion" options from the
NewNodecomponent's options array aligns with the PR's objective of UI enhancements and potential workflow restructuring. However, it's important to communicate these changes clearly to users, especially if they significantly alter how users interact with the application's workflow functionality.Consider adding a user-facing notification or documentation update to inform users about these changes and any potential impact on their workflows.
| const SearchableDropdown = ({ | ||
| options, | ||
| label, | ||
| id, | ||
| selectedValue, | ||
| handleChange | ||
| }) => { | ||
| const [query, setQuery] = useState(""); | ||
| const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false); | ||
|
|
||
| const inputRef = useRef(null); | ||
|
|
||
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| document.addEventListener("click", toggle); | ||
| return () => document.removeEventListener("click", toggle); | ||
| }, []); | ||
|
|
||
| const selectOption = (option) => { | ||
| setQuery(() => ""); | ||
| handleChange(option); | ||
| setIsOpen((isOpen) => !isOpen); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| function toggle(e) { | ||
| setIsOpen(e && e.target === inputRef.current); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const getDisplayValue = () => { | ||
| if (query) return query; | ||
| if (selectedValue) return selectedValue[label] || ""; | ||
|
|
||
| return ""; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const filter = (options) => { | ||
| return options.filter( | ||
| (option) => option[label].toLowerCase().indexOf(query.toLowerCase()) > -1 | ||
| ); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <div className="dropdown"> | ||
| <div className="control"> | ||
| <div className="selected-value"> | ||
| <input | ||
| ref={inputRef} | ||
| className="input" | ||
| type="text" | ||
| value={getDisplayValue()} | ||
| name="searchTerm" | ||
| onChange={(e) => { | ||
| setQuery(e.target.value); | ||
| handleChange(null); | ||
| }} | ||
| onClick={toggle} | ||
| /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| {selectedValue[label] && <div className="close" onClick={() => handleChange({})}/>} | ||
| <div className={`arrow ${isOpen ? "open" : ""}`}></div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <div className={`options ${isOpen ? "open" : ""}`}> | ||
| {filter(options).map((option, index) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <div | ||
| role="option" | ||
| onClick={() => selectOption(option)} | ||
| className={`option ${ | ||
| option === selectedValue ? "selected" : "" | ||
| }`} | ||
| key={`${id}-${index}`} | ||
| > | ||
| {option[label]} | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); | ||
| })} | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| SearchableDropdown.propTypes = { | ||
| options: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.object), | ||
| label: PropTypes.string, | ||
| id: PropTypes.string, | ||
| selectedValue: PropTypes.object, | ||
| handleChange: PropTypes.func | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export default SearchableDropdown; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The SearchableDropdown component is well-implemented, with clear handling of state and events. Consider adding accessibility attributes (e.g., aria-labels) to improve accessibility. Also, ensure that the handleChange function is robust and handles all necessary cases for updating the parent component's state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- web/src/core/components/dropdown/index.jsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/core/components/flow/form.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/src/service/app/test_suit.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- web/src/core/components/dropdown/index.jsx
- web/src/core/components/flow/form.tsx
- web/src/service/app/test_suit.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- web/src/service/app/action_group.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/service/app/test_case.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/service/app/test_case.ts
| console.error("fetch Actions failed with some reason =", error); | ||
| return error; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changing the console.log to console.error for error logging is a good practice. However, returning the error object directly from the fetchActions function instead of an empty array introduces a type inconsistency issue. This could potentially lead to bugs if the callers of this function are not expecting an error object as a return type.
Consider handling the error more gracefully by either always returning an array (empty or filled with actions) or by throwing the error to be caught by the caller, ensuring the return type of the function remains consistent.
- return error;
+ throw error;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| console.error("fetch Actions failed with some reason =", error); | |
| return error; | |
| console.error("fetch Actions failed with some reason =", error); | |
| throw error; |
Summary by CodeRabbit
SearchableDropdowncomponent enhancing dropdowns with search functionality.fetchTestCasesthat retrieves all test cases for a specific application efficiently.SearchableDropdowninto theWorkflowFormfor improved action group selection.<React.StrictMode>for compatibility adjustments.