Fix compilation issues after upgrade to Lucene 10

[cwperks]

Description

Adapt to Lucene 10 changes from core. Related PR: opensearch-project/OpenSearch#16366

• Category (Enhancement, New feature, Bug fix, Test fix, Refactoring, Maintenance, Documentation)

Maintenance

Check List

• New functionality includes testing
• New functionality has been documented
• New Roles/Permissions have a corresponding security dashboards plugin PR
• API changes companion pull request created
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[cwperks]

@nibix May need some insight on the failing test:

./gradlew dlicDlsFlsTest --tests FlsExistsFieldsTest.testExistsField -i

3d9abf4 is the commit that resolves compilation errors in FlsDlsFilterLeafReader for Lucene 10 upgrade

[reta]

Thanks lot @cwperks !

[cwperks]

@reta There are failing checks that I'm struggling to resolve.

The bwc test: https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/actions/runs/13251050903/job/36989972019?pr=5053

A few FLS tests: https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/actions/runs/13251050903/job/36989977628?pr=5053

Edit: BWC failures are due to running alpha1 security w/o running the respective build of the core

[reta]

The bwc test: https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/actions/runs/13251050903/job/36989972019?pr=5053

Yes, @cwperks , just looking into them as well, the first strange thing - usage of 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT artifacts, still:

 »  	at org.opensearch.bootstrap.OpenSearch.init(OpenSearch.java:185) ~[opensearch-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT]
»  	at org.opensearch.bootstrap.OpenSearch.execute(OpenSearch.java:172) ~[opensearch-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT]

Looking closely

[reta]

The bwc test: https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/actions/runs/13251050903/job/36989972019?pr=5053

Fixed those, but not DLS ones ...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.47%. Comparing base (2cb9f7e) to head (7921955).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...security/configuration/DlsFlsFilterLeafReader.java	27.27%	7 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5053      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.55%   71.47%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         336      336              
  Lines       22649    22647       -2     
  Branches     3603     3603              
==========================================
- Hits        16207    16187      -20     
- Misses       4643     4660      +17     
- Partials     1799     1800       +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../opensearch/security/OpenSearchSecurityPlugin.java	83.79% <ø> (ø)
...ction/configupdate/ConfigUpdateRequestBuilder.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...y/action/onbehalf/CreateOnBehalfOfTokenAction.java	79.03% <ø> (ø)
...h/security/action/whoami/WhoAmIRequestBuilder.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...pensearch/security/auditlog/impl/AuditLogImpl.java	89.28% <ø> (ø)
.../security/auditlog/routing/AuditMessageRouter.java	81.60% <ø> (ø)
.../auditlog/sink/AbstractInternalOpenSearchSink.java	80.64% <ø> (ø)
...uditlog/sink/InternalOpenSearchDataStreamSink.java	84.00% <ø> (ø)
...security/auditlog/sink/InternalOpenSearchSink.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...pensearch/security/auditlog/sink/SinkProvider.java	83.51% <ø> (ø)
... and 28 more

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

[cwperks]

Merging this with single approval to unblock the build and other components affected by security