Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Remove special handling for do_not_fail_on_forbidden on cluster actions #4489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport f37399e from #4486.

…ns (#4486)

Signed-off-by: Nils Bandener <nils.bandener@eliatra.com>
(cherry picked from commit f37399e)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.37%. Comparing base (5d56064) to head (9e9ba7f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on 2.x.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.x    #4489      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.39%   65.37%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         312      312              
  Lines       21889    21876      -13     
  Branches     3553     3549       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        14314    14301      -13     
+ Misses       5806     5805       -1     
- Partials     1769     1770       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
...earch/security/privileges/PrivilegesEvaluator.java 72.29% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@RyanL1997 RyanL1997 merged commit abf0be8 into 2.x Jun 25, 2024
88 checks passed
@RyanL1997 RyanL1997 deleted the backport/backport-4486-to-2.x branch June 25, 2024 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants