Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve issues where UPDATE_GITHUB_ISSUE is not supported in check-for-build #5350

Conversation

peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member

Description

Resolve issues where UPDATE_GITHUB_ISSUE is not supported in check-for-build

Issues Resolved

#3747

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

…r-build

Signed-off-by: Peter Zhu <zhujiaxi@amazon.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.04%. Comparing base (c8b2f8f) to head (151cc26).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5350   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.04%   92.04%           
=======================================
  Files         202      202           
  Lines        7043     7043           
=======================================
  Hits         6483     6483           
  Misses        560      560           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon merged commit 478cacb into opensearch-project:main Feb 26, 2025
16 checks passed
@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon deleted the update-checkforbuild-updategithub branch February 26, 2025 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants