Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed dblock@ from CODEOWNERS. #5349

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

dblock
Copy link
Member

@dblock dblock commented Feb 26, 2025

Description

Removed dblock@ from CODEOWNERS. Forgot to do it as part of #5347.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Daniel (dB.) Doubrovkine <dblock@dblock.org>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.04%. Comparing base (120c6f5) to head (85bd2b6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5349   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.04%   92.04%           
=======================================
  Files         202      202           
  Lines        7043     7043           
=======================================
  Hits         6483     6483           
  Misses        560      560           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member

Thanks DB for all the hardwork!

@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon merged commit c8b2f8f into opensearch-project:main Feb 26, 2025
16 checks passed
@dblock dblock deleted the dblock-codeowners branch February 26, 2025 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants