-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 284
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Retrospective] Release version 2.5.0 #3117
Comments
1.) Plan to fix flaky tests in respective repos |
Add 2 issues impact SQL plugin.
|
Development should create documentation issues for features that require documentation. It's best to enter an issue as early as possible in the release cycle or reach out directly to your documentation partner. Some requests didn't get to us until code freeze or after and we didn't have enough time to get them assigned and through the review process. Review process is tech review, 2 doc reviews, and editorial. To insist on the highest standards, the review process can require several iterations over several days. |
For future releases, let's explore ways to confirm final roster of included features earlier in the release cycle to support content development deadlines. |
Completed Retro. |
#2908
How to use this issue?
Please add comments to this issue, they can be small or large in scope. Honest feedback is important to improve our processes, suggestions are also welcomed but not required.
What will happen to this issue post release?
There will be a discussion(s) about how the release went and how the next release can be improved. Then this ticket will be updated with the notes of that discussion along side action items.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: