Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] flat_object filed supports wildcard query since 2.18 #8827

Closed
4 tasks
kkewwei opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8863
Closed
4 tasks

[DOC] flat_object filed supports wildcard query since 2.18 #8827

kkewwei opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8863
Assignees
Labels
1 - Backlog - DOC Doc writer assigned to issue responsible for creating PR. 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress.

Comments

@kkewwei
Copy link
Contributor

kkewwei commented Nov 29, 2024

What do you want to do?
https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/field-types/supported-field-types/flat-object/#supported-queries

https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/blob/2.18.0/server/src/main/java/org/opensearch/index/mapper/FlatObjectFieldMapper.java

  • Request a change to existing documentation
  • Add new documentation
  • Report a technical problem with the documentation
  • Other

Tell us about your request. Provide a summary of the request.

Version: List the OpenSearch version to which this issue applies, e.g. 2.14, 2.12--2.14, or all.

What other resources are available? Provide links to related issues, POCs, steps for testing, etc.

@Naarcha-AWS Naarcha-AWS added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. 1 - Backlog - DOC Doc writer assigned to issue responsible for creating PR. and removed untriaged labels Dec 3, 2024
@Naarcha-AWS Naarcha-AWS self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 - Backlog - DOC Doc writer assigned to issue responsible for creating PR. 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants